Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266
| Judge | Crighton,Ho,Wakeling |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 266 |
| Docket Number | 2101-0020AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 08 August 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 practice notes
-
Savoie v Lambert,
...to the principles of coherency, consistency and consistent expression: Vavilov at para 44; Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266 at para 27; R v Ulybel Enterprises Ltd, 2001 SCC 56 at para 30. Interpretations that minimize the possibility of conflict or incoherence among ......
-
Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
...words have the same meaning both within a statute and across statutes): Vavilov at para 44; Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266 at para 27; R v Ulybel Enterprises Ltd, 2001 SCC 56 at para 30. Interpretations that minimize the possibility of conflict or incoherence among......
-
O'Reilly v O'Reilly,
...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 at para 44; Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266 at para 27, citing R v Ulybel Enterprises Ltd, 2001 SCC 56 at para 173 Further, in determining whether to grant an FMS order, the Court must consider ......
-
Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd,
...Judge decisions because that is how the Court of Appeal sometimes still refers to them: see Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266, leave to appeal refused [2022] SCCA No 346 at para 30 and Gouthro v Kubicki, 2023 ABCA 108 at para 4. In my view, the use of the term de novo......
Get Started for Free
16 cases
-
Savoie v Lambert,
...to the principles of coherency, consistency and consistent expression: Vavilov at para 44; Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266 at para 27; R v Ulybel Enterprises Ltd, 2001 SCC 56 at para 30. Interpretations that minimize the possibility of conflict or incoherence among ......
-
Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
...words have the same meaning both within a statute and across statutes): Vavilov at para 44; Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266 at para 27; R v Ulybel Enterprises Ltd, 2001 SCC 56 at para 30. Interpretations that minimize the possibility of conflict or incoherence among......
-
O'Reilly v O'Reilly,
...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 at para 44; Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266 at para 27, citing R v Ulybel Enterprises Ltd, 2001 SCC 56 at para 173 Further, in determining whether to grant an FMS order, the Court must consider ......
-
Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd,
...Judge decisions because that is how the Court of Appeal sometimes still refers to them: see Agrium v Orbis Engineering Field Services, 2022 ABCA 266, leave to appeal refused [2022] SCCA No 346 at para 30 and Gouthro v Kubicki, 2023 ABCA 108 at para 4. In my view, the use of the term de novo......
Get Started for Free