Aguiar v 5026113 et al, 2019 MBCA 47
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Judge | Chartier,Monnin,Steel |
Citation | 2019 MBCA 47 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Docket Number | AI18-30-09106 |
Date | 23 April 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
MOUNTAIN INVESTMENT CORP. v. QUEWEZANCE,
...The similarity in Manitoba and Saskatchewan legislation is shown in Aguiar v 5026113, 2018 MBQB 70 at para 31 [Aguiar], upheld in 2019 MBCA 47, which reproduces s. 2 of The Unconscionable Transactions Relief Act, CCSM, c U20, [Manitoba Act] which is almost identical to s. 3 of the Saskatche......
-
Sartor et al v Boon et al, 2020 MBCA 36
...entered into. He has made a practice of seeking out the financially vulnerable (see Brown et al v Boon et al; and Aguiar v 5026113 et al, 2019 MBCA 47). We see no error warranting appellate intervention in the motion judge’s decision in this regard or in her decision that the award of punit......
2 cases
-
MOUNTAIN INVESTMENT CORP. v. QUEWEZANCE,
...The similarity in Manitoba and Saskatchewan legislation is shown in Aguiar v 5026113, 2018 MBQB 70 at para 31 [Aguiar], upheld in 2019 MBCA 47, which reproduces s. 2 of The Unconscionable Transactions Relief Act, CCSM, c U20, [Manitoba Act] which is almost identical to s. 3 of the Saskatche......
-
Sartor et al v Boon et al, 2020 MBCA 36
...entered into. He has made a practice of seeking out the financially vulnerable (see Brown et al v Boon et al; and Aguiar v 5026113 et al, 2019 MBCA 47). We see no error warranting appellate intervention in the motion judge’s decision in this regard or in her decision that the award of punit......