Akinfolajimi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 12, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2018 FC 722 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Zidan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 170
...compassionate grounds under IRPA subs. 25(1): see Douillard and Kim, cited above and Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722, at paras 5, 30, and 32-33. [42] I therefore conclude that the RAD provided the applicants with procedural fairness. B. Was the RAD’s ......
-
Douillard v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390
...on their own, confer Convention refugee or person in need of protection status (Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722 at para 5). [32] Here, there is no evidence that the rejection of the applicants’ refugee protection claim will necessarily lead to their separati......
-
Hamid v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145
...is not the role of the Court in judicial review proceedings (Vavilov at para 125; Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722 at paras 27-28; Titcombe at para 22; Khosa at para 61). VII. [58] The application for judicial review is dismissed. JUDGMENT in IMM-2784-19 THIS......
-
Vartia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1426
...own merit on the basis of the definitions set out in sections 96 and 97 of IRPA (Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722 at para 30). The Applicants each bore the burden of establishing their refugee claims, including that it would be unreasonable for them to seek r......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Zidan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 170
...compassionate grounds under IRPA subs. 25(1): see Douillard and Kim, cited above and Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722, at paras 5, 30, and 32-33. [42] I therefore conclude that the RAD provided the applicants with procedural fairness. B. Was the RAD’s ......
-
Douillard v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 390
...on their own, confer Convention refugee or person in need of protection status (Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722 at para 5). [32] Here, there is no evidence that the rejection of the applicants’ refugee protection claim will necessarily lead to their separati......
-
Hamid v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145
...is not the role of the Court in judicial review proceedings (Vavilov at para 125; Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722 at paras 27-28; Titcombe at para 22; Khosa at para 61). VII. [58] The application for judicial review is dismissed. JUDGMENT in IMM-2784-19 THIS......
-
Vartia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1426
...own merit on the basis of the definitions set out in sections 96 and 97 of IRPA (Akinfolajimi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 722 at para 30). The Applicants each bore the burden of establishing their refugee claims, including that it would be unreasonable for them to seek r......
Request a trial to view additional results