Akintola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 971 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 15 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Bayram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 235
...between the parties that the applicable standard of review is reasonableness. I agree (Akintola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971 at para 7, citing Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 [Vavilov]; Ifogah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigrati......
-
Bolanle Lasisi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 205
...on appeal may not form the basis of judicial review of the RAD’s decision: Akintola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971 at para 21; Abdulmaula v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 14 at paras 13-16; Dovha v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 864 ......
-
Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 271
...standard of review applicable to the RAD’s decision is reasonableness. I agree (Akintola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971 at para 7, citing Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (“Vavilov”)). [15] Reasonableness is a ......
-
Alvarenga Torres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...her credibility. [48] Third, credibility and implausibility findings are within the purview of the RAD: see Akintola v Canada (MCI), 2020 FC 971 (Pallotta J.), at paras 12-14; Amiryar v Canada (MCI), 2016 FC 1023 (Gleeson J.), at paras 17-20. On the credibility findings, the RPD and RAD agr......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Bayram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 235
...between the parties that the applicable standard of review is reasonableness. I agree (Akintola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971 at para 7, citing Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 [Vavilov]; Ifogah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigrati......
-
Bolanle Lasisi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 205
...on appeal may not form the basis of judicial review of the RAD’s decision: Akintola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971 at para 21; Abdulmaula v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 14 at paras 13-16; Dovha v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 864 ......
-
Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 271
...standard of review applicable to the RAD’s decision is reasonableness. I agree (Akintola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 971 at para 7, citing Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 (“Vavilov”)). [15] Reasonableness is a ......
-
Alvarenga Torres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...her credibility. [48] Third, credibility and implausibility findings are within the purview of the RAD: see Akintola v Canada (MCI), 2020 FC 971 (Pallotta J.), at paras 12-14; Amiryar v Canada (MCI), 2016 FC 1023 (Gleeson J.), at paras 17-20. On the credibility findings, the RPD and RAD agr......
Request a trial to view additional results