Alalouf v. Sumar
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Alexandra Hoy A.C.J.O.,G.T. Trotter J.A.,M. Jamal J.A. |
| Citation | 2019 ONCA 611 |
| Date | 19 July 2019 |
| Docket Number | C63949 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
A.E v. A.E.
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances (Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, at para. 14).  Ultimately, the factors and objectives of spousal support as set out in sections 15.2(4)......
-
J.M.M. v C.R.M
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances ( Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, at para. 14). Ultimately, the factors and objectives of spousal support set out in sections 15.2(4) and (6)......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 15 19, 2019)
...As such, the Court allowed the appeal and reversed the trial judge's award of damages for this "lost opportunity." In Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611, the Court affirmed the principle that in family litigation, a highly deferential standard of review is owed to the factual findings of the t......
-
Khan v Khan
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances ( Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, at para. 14). Ultimately, the factors and objectives of spousal support set out in sections 15.2(4) and (6)......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
A.E v. A.E.
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances (Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, at para. 14).  Ultimately, the factors and objectives of spousal support as set out in sections 15.2(4)......
-
J.M.M. v C.R.M
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances ( Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, at para. 14). Ultimately, the factors and objectives of spousal support set out in sections 15.2(4) and (6)......
-
Khan v Khan
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances ( Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, at para. 14). Ultimately, the factors and objectives of spousal support set out in sections 15.2(4) and (6)......
-
McBennett v Danis
...discretion, and it is therefore open to the court to go above and below the ranges in appropriate circumstances (Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611 (C.A.), at paras. 21 and 24; Naegels, Div. Ct. decision, at para. 14).  The SSAG, the Revised User’s Guide and the caselaw have highli......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 15 19, 2019)
...As such, the Court allowed the appeal and reversed the trial judge's award of damages for this "lost opportunity." In Alalouf v. Sumar, 2019 ONCA 611, the Court affirmed the principle that in family litigation, a highly deferential standard of review is owed to the factual findings of the t......