Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeGlustein
Citation2019 ONSC 131
Date08 January 2019
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Docket NumberCV-06-309948PD3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Harper v. American Medical Systems Canada Inc., 2019 ONSC 5723
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 4, 2019
    ...& Johnson, 2011 ONSC 128 at para. 59. [21] Park v. Nongshim Co., 2019 ONSC 1997; Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co., 2019 ONSC 131; Domage v. Ontario, 2017 ONSC 4178; Serhan v. Johnson & Johnson, 2011 ONSC 128 at paras. 57-59; Elliott v. Boliden Ltd., [2006] O.J. No. 4116......
  • Morrison Estate v. Nova Scotia (Health), 2020 NSSC 234
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • September 2, 2020
    ...2020 CarswellAlta 603 [“Elder Advocates Leave to Appeal to SCC”] [9] Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131 para. 54 [Ali Holdco Inc.] (Plaintiffs’ Authorities, Tab 2); Parker v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2017 ONSC 2418, at para. 17 [10] Winter v. C.......
  • Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 16, 2019
    ...of any undistributed portion of the Settlement Fund? i) The applicable law [97] In Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131, I summarized the applicable principles for cy-près settlements as follows (also referring to my decision in Cass) (at paras. In Cass (at para.......
  • Cy-près Distributions: Uses And Controversies
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 24, 2019
    ...of settlement funds can be less controversial; one was recently approved in Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131. After settling with one of several defendants, the plaintiffs sought to discontinue the action. Rather than distributing the settlement funds to clas......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Harper v. American Medical Systems Canada Inc., 2019 ONSC 5723
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 4, 2019
    ...& Johnson, 2011 ONSC 128 at para. 59. [21] Park v. Nongshim Co., 2019 ONSC 1997; Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co., 2019 ONSC 131; Domage v. Ontario, 2017 ONSC 4178; Serhan v. Johnson & Johnson, 2011 ONSC 128 at paras. 57-59; Elliott v. Boliden Ltd., [2006] O.J. No. 4116......
  • Haikola v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2019 ONSC 5982
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 16, 2019
    ...of any undistributed portion of the Settlement Fund? i) The applicable law [97] In Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131, I summarized the applicable principles for cy-près settlements as follows (also referring to my decision in Cass) (at paras. In Cass (at para.......
  • Morrison Estate v. Nova Scotia (Health), 2020 NSSC 234
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • September 2, 2020
    ...2020 CarswellAlta 603 [“Elder Advocates Leave to Appeal to SCC”] [9] Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131 para. 54 [Ali Holdco Inc.] (Plaintiffs’ Authorities, Tab 2); Parker v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2017 ONSC 2418, at para. 17 [10] Winter v. C.......
  • Cappelli v. Nobilis Health Corp., 2019 ONSC 4521
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 29, 2019
    ...& Johnson, 2011 ONSC 128 at para. 59. [23] Park v. Nongshim Co., 2019 ONSC 1997; Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co., 2019 ONSC 131; Domage v. Ontario, 2017 ONSC 4178; Serhan v. Johnson & Johnson, 2011 ONSC 128 at paras. 57-59; Elliott v. Boliden Ltd., [2006] O.J. No. 4116......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Cy-près Distributions: Uses And Controversies
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 24, 2019
    ...of settlement funds can be less controversial; one was recently approved in Ali Holdco Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2019 ONSC 131. After settling with one of several defendants, the plaintiffs sought to discontinue the action. Rather than distributing the settlement funds to clas......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT