Allart Estate et al. v. Allart, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2211 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHarris, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,WILLS
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2211 (SC),2014 BCSC 2211,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2211
Date25 November 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Jung Estate v. Jung Estate,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 2, 2022
    ...BCSC 976 at para. 31, aff’d 2014 BCCA 28, leave to appeal ref’d [2014] S.C.C.A. No. 261 [Leung]; Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 33 [Allart Estate]. [40]       Suspicious circumstances must raise what has been described as a ......
  • Re Charbonneau Estate,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 19, 2021
    ...see Vout at para. 25; Singh Estate (Re), 2019 BCSC 272 at paras. 69 to 71 [Singh Estate], and Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 32 [Allart [24]        As explained by Madam Justice Dardi in Leung v. Chang, 2013 BCSC 976 at par......
  • Johnston Estate v. Johnston, 2019 BCSC 2149
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 11, 2019
    ...are natural objects of his or her estate and the extent of his or her property of which he or she is disposing: Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 30; Leung at para. 27; and Laszlo at para. 158. A testator cannot be found not to have testamentary capacity simply because he cho......
  • Jakonen Estate (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 24, 2022
    ...who are natural objects of his/her estate and the extent of his/her property of which he/she is disposing: Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 30; Leung at para. 27 and Laszlo v. Lawton, 2013 BCSC 305 at [117]    Because testamentary capacity is a legal ques......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Jung Estate v. Jung Estate,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 2, 2022
    ...BCSC 976 at para. 31, aff’d 2014 BCCA 28, leave to appeal ref’d [2014] S.C.C.A. No. 261 [Leung]; Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 33 [Allart Estate]. [40]       Suspicious circumstances must raise what has been described as a ......
  • Re Charbonneau Estate,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 19, 2021
    ...see Vout at para. 25; Singh Estate (Re), 2019 BCSC 272 at paras. 69 to 71 [Singh Estate], and Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 32 [Allart [24]        As explained by Madam Justice Dardi in Leung v. Chang, 2013 BCSC 976 at par......
  • Johnston Estate v. Johnston, 2019 BCSC 2149
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 11, 2019
    ...are natural objects of his or her estate and the extent of his or her property of which he or she is disposing: Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 30; Leung at para. 27; and Laszlo at para. 158. A testator cannot be found not to have testamentary capacity simply because he cho......
  • Jakonen Estate (Re),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 24, 2022
    ...who are natural objects of his/her estate and the extent of his/her property of which he/she is disposing: Allart Estate v. Allart, 2014 BCSC 2211 at para. 30; Leung at para. 27 and Laszlo v. Lawton, 2013 BCSC 305 at [117]    Because testamentary capacity is a legal ques......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT