Amadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1166 |
| Date | 12 September 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Feboke v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 155
...IFA is part and parcel of the process of consideration under sections 96 and 97 of the IRPA (Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at paras 41-42). Consequently, the only determinative issue dealt with by the RAD was whether Ibadan constituted a viable IFA. [10] On the ......
-
Muchenje v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 194
...assessed does not change the fact that the Applicant had a viable IFA in Bulawayo (Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at para 41). [37] Turning to the IFA, there is a high onus on an applicant to demonstrate that a proposed IFA is unreasonable (Ranganathan at para 15......
-
Yusuf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1032
...Nurses’ Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 at para 16; Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at para [13] Although in some circumstances, a RAD decision can be impugned where it is silent on evidence contrary to its findings, especial......
-
Akbar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1101
...Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 at para 16 as cited in Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166). [47] The jurisprudence that the Applicant cited is distinguishable in this case. In Osikoya and Sitnikova, the issue was an unspoken finding by......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Feboke v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 155
...IFA is part and parcel of the process of consideration under sections 96 and 97 of the IRPA (Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at paras 41-42). Consequently, the only determinative issue dealt with by the RAD was whether Ibadan constituted a viable IFA. [10] On the ......
-
Muchenje v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 194
...assessed does not change the fact that the Applicant had a viable IFA in Bulawayo (Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at para 41). [37] Turning to the IFA, there is a high onus on an applicant to demonstrate that a proposed IFA is unreasonable (Ranganathan at para 15......
-
Yusuf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1032
...Nurses’ Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 at para 16; Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at para [13] Although in some circumstances, a RAD decision can be impugned where it is silent on evidence contrary to its findings, especial......
-
Dada v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1706
...which would jeopardize their life and safety in traveling to the IFA or relocating there: Amadi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1166 at paras 45-46; Ranganathan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 2 FC 164 at paras 13-15, 102 ACWS (3d) 592 (FCA). I agr......
Request a trial to view additional results