Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 428

JudgeJ.D. Rooke
Neutral Citation2021 ABQB 428
Citation2021 ABQB 428
Docket Number2101 03903
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date01 June 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...pseudolaw activities are documented in a number of Court Decisions, including: Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 382 , action struck out 2021 ABQB 428, costs ordered 2021 ABQB 456 ; Anderson (Re), 2022 ABQB 35 ; Canada (Attorney General) v Anderson, 2022 ABQB 310 ; Royal Bank of Canada v A......
  • Docken v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 29, 2023
    ...her attempts to simply invent her own court, that will, once again, fail: Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 382 , action struck out 2021 ABQB 428, costs awarded 2021 ABQB 28 Next the “COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT” seems to question the constitutionality of litigation management, poin......
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 22, 2023
    ...and Ms. Anderson was instructed to make submissions as to why she should not be subject to elevated cost awards: Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 428 [ Anderson v Ossowski #2]. June 11, 2021 – Ms. Anderson responded by sending the Court copies of the earlier two Anderson v Ossows......
3 cases
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...pseudolaw activities are documented in a number of Court Decisions, including: Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 382 , action struck out 2021 ABQB 428, costs ordered 2021 ABQB 456 ; Anderson (Re), 2022 ABQB 35 ; Canada (Attorney General) v Anderson, 2022 ABQB 310 ; Royal Bank of Canada v A......
  • Docken v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 29, 2023
    ...her attempts to simply invent her own court, that will, once again, fail: Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 382 , action struck out 2021 ABQB 428, costs awarded 2021 ABQB 28 Next the “COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT” seems to question the constitutionality of litigation management, poin......
  • Royal Bank of Canada v Anderson,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 22, 2023
    ...and Ms. Anderson was instructed to make submissions as to why she should not be subject to elevated cost awards: Anderson v Ossowski, 2021 ABQB 428 [ Anderson v Ossowski #2]. June 11, 2021 – Ms. Anderson responded by sending the Court copies of the earlier two Anderson v Ossows......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT