Anku v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date08 February 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Khir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 18, 2021
    ...J.), at para 21; Torrance v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 634 (Gascon J.), at para 58; Anku v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 (Pallotta J.), at paras 27-35. [49] This analysis shows that the Court’s assessment when it applies the Cepeda-Gutierrez principles i......
  • Kediye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 26, 2021
    ...individual circumstances to determine whether a durable solution exists. [27] In Anku v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 [Anku], my colleague Justice Christine Pallotta allowed an application for judicial review of a visa officer’s decision that the applicant had a d......
  • Isaac v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 940
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 22, 2022
    ...indicate the Officer engaged with or had knowledge of such evidence. Relying on Anku v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 at paragraph 20, the applicants argue that a failure to make factual findings about conditions in the country of reference can render a decisi......
  • Tshibangile v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 14, 2021
    ...of review [10] The standard of reasonableness applies to decisions of immigration officers (Anku v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 at para 8 [Anku]; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 at para 25 [Vavilov]. [11] In assessing a procedural......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Khir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 160
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 18, 2021
    ...J.), at para 21; Torrance v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 634 (Gascon J.), at para 58; Anku v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 (Pallotta J.), at paras 27-35. [49] This analysis shows that the Court’s assessment when it applies the Cepeda-Gutierrez principles i......
  • Kediye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 26, 2021
    ...individual circumstances to determine whether a durable solution exists. [27] In Anku v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 [Anku], my colleague Justice Christine Pallotta allowed an application for judicial review of a visa officer’s decision that the applicant had a d......
  • Isaac v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 940
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 22, 2022
    ...indicate the Officer engaged with or had knowledge of such evidence. Relying on Anku v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 at paragraph 20, the applicants argue that a failure to make factual findings about conditions in the country of reference can render a decisi......
  • Tshibangile v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 14, 2021
    ...of review [10] The standard of reasonableness applies to decisions of immigration officers (Anku v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 125 at para 8 [Anku]; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65 at para 25 [Vavilov]. [11] In assessing a procedural......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT