Anterra Wines Canada, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 508 |
| Date | 09 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
IP Litigation 2020 Year In Review
...66. 77. Pentastar Transport Ltd. v. FCA US LLC, 2020 FC 367(Justice Kane). 78. Arterra Wines Canada, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508 (Justice 79. Obsidian Group Inc v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 586 (Justice Fuhrer). 80. Obsidian Group Inc v. Canada (Attorney General......
-
Year In Review ' Key Trademark Cases From 2020
...standard of correctness. Less than a month later, Justice Fuhrer found in Arterra Wines Canada, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508 to similar effect as Justice Kane, referencing Justice Kane's Pentastar decision. In the case before her, Justice Fuhrer also needed to address how......
-
Mondo Foods Co. Ltd. v. TorreMondo Industries Inc., 2022 FC 926
...be a relevant “surrounding circumstance” in the confusion analysis: Arterra Wines Canada, Inc v Diageo North America, Inc, 2020 FC 508 at para 41. Nonetheless, while some relevant factors may be the same for more than one trademark, the confusion analysis must be undertaken fo......
-
Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2021 FC 35
...56(1) of the TMA: Pentastar Transport Ltd. v FCA US LLC, 2020 FC 367 at para 118; Arterra Wines Canada, Inc. v Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508 at para 72. [59] I agree that a lump sum award is appropriate. I consider $7,500 to reflect a reasonable cost award in this proceeding. My d......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Mondo Foods Co. Ltd. v. TorreMondo Industries Inc., 2022 FC 926
...be a relevant “surrounding circumstance” in the confusion analysis: Arterra Wines Canada, Inc v Diageo North America, Inc, 2020 FC 508 at para 41. Nonetheless, while some relevant factors may be the same for more than one trademark, the confusion analysis must be undertaken fo......
-
Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2021 FC 35
...56(1) of the TMA: Pentastar Transport Ltd. v FCA US LLC, 2020 FC 367 at para 118; Arterra Wines Canada, Inc. v Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508 at para 72. [59] I agree that a lump sum award is appropriate. I consider $7,500 to reflect a reasonable cost award in this proceeding. My d......
-
Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd. v. Herbs “R” Us Wellness Society, 2020 FC 682
...broader scope of protection that may in some cases be granted to a family of marks: Arterra Wines Canada, Inc v Diageo North America, Inc, 2020 FC 508 at para 41. Rather, it places primary reliance on the ’641 Mark and the ’213 Mark, and asserts that the design mark used by Herbs “R” Us, sh......
2 firm's commentaries
-
IP Litigation 2020 Year In Review
...66. 77. Pentastar Transport Ltd. v. FCA US LLC, 2020 FC 367(Justice Kane). 78. Arterra Wines Canada, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508 (Justice 79. Obsidian Group Inc v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 586 (Justice Fuhrer). 80. Obsidian Group Inc v. Canada (Attorney General......
-
Year In Review ' Key Trademark Cases From 2020
...standard of correctness. Less than a month later, Justice Fuhrer found in Arterra Wines Canada, Inc. v. Diageo North America, Inc., 2020 FC 508 to similar effect as Justice Kane, referencing Justice Kane's Pentastar decision. In the case before her, Justice Fuhrer also needed to address how......