Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
JudgeHarrington, J.
Citation[2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402,[2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 (FC),2013 FC 192
Date12 March 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 practice notes
  • Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. et al., (2013) 436 F.T.R. 198 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 27, 2013
    ...Inc. et al. (2011), 385 F.T.R. 157 ; 2011 FC 239 , refd to. [para. 11]. Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 ; 2013 FC 192, refd to. [para. Lundbeck Canada Inc. et al. v. ratiopharm Inc. et al. (2009), 357 F.T.R. 75 ; 79 C.P.R.(4th) 243 ; 2009 FC 1102 , refd to. [......
  • Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., 2015 FC 108
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 16, 2015
    ...Uned. 259 ; [2008] UKHL 49 , refd to. [para. 190]. Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 ; 111 C.P.R.(4th) 171 ; 2013 FC 192, refd to. [para. Lilly Icos LLC v. Pfizer Ltd., [2000] EWHC Patents 49 , refd to. [para. 203]. Apotex Inc. and Novopharm Ltd. v. Wellcome Foun......
  • Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 8, 2015
    ...Products Ltd. (1982), 68 C.P.R.(2d) 204 (F.C.T.D.), consd. [para. 73]. Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 ; 2013 FC 192, consd. [paras. 73, Reading & Bates Construction Co. v. Baker Energy Resources Co., Baker Marine Co. and Gaz Intercité Quebec Inc., [1995] 1......
  • Rovi Guides, Inc. v. BCE Inc.
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 24, 2022
    ...particular experience, he cannot put himself into the shoes of the non-inventive skilled person: Apotex Inc v H Lundbeck A/S, 2013 FC 192 [H Lundbeck] at paras 118, 122. In my view, this is pure speculation on Rovi’s part and inconsistent with the evidence before me. [127] Mr. Kerr t......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. et al., (2013) 436 F.T.R. 198 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 27, 2013
    ...Inc. et al. (2011), 385 F.T.R. 157 ; 2011 FC 239 , refd to. [para. 11]. Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 ; 2013 FC 192, refd to. [para. Lundbeck Canada Inc. et al. v. ratiopharm Inc. et al. (2009), 357 F.T.R. 75 ; 79 C.P.R.(4th) 243 ; 2009 FC 1102 , refd to. [......
  • Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Canada (Minister of Health) et al., 2015 FC 108
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 16, 2015
    ...Uned. 259 ; [2008] UKHL 49 , refd to. [para. 190]. Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 ; 111 C.P.R.(4th) 171 ; 2013 FC 192, refd to. [para. Lilly Icos LLC v. Pfizer Ltd., [2000] EWHC Patents 49 , refd to. [para. 203]. Apotex Inc. and Novopharm Ltd. v. Wellcome Foun......
  • Laboratoires Servier et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 8, 2015
    ...Products Ltd. (1982), 68 C.P.R.(2d) 204 (F.C.T.D.), consd. [para. 73]. Apotex Inc. v. Lundbeck (H.) A/S, [2013] F.T.R. Uned. 402 ; 2013 FC 192, consd. [paras. 73, Reading & Bates Construction Co. v. Baker Energy Resources Co., Baker Marine Co. and Gaz Intercité Quebec Inc., [1995] 1......
  • Rovi Guides, Inc. v. BCE Inc.
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 24, 2022
    ...particular experience, he cannot put himself into the shoes of the non-inventive skilled person: Apotex Inc v H Lundbeck A/S, 2013 FC 192 [H Lundbeck] at paras 118, 122. In my view, this is pure speculation on Rovi’s part and inconsistent with the evidence before me. [127] Mr. Kerr t......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Patents Year In Review 2013
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 6, 2014
    ...challenger is not subject to the Regulations while potential competitors are, conversely, subject thereto. Apotex Inc. v. H. Lundbeck A/S, 2013 FC 192: the Federal Court in this case ordered a generic to pay a patentee $1.7 million as an accounting of the generic's profits for patent infrin......
  • No Good, Just The Bad And The Ugly – Punitive Damages For Patent Infringement In Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 9, 2016
    ...Ltd, 2002 FCA 158. 3 Eurocopter v. Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Ltee., 2012 FC 113; aff'd 2013 FCA 219. 4 2014 FCA 138. 5 2013 FC 192. 6 2014 FAC 7 Apotex Inc and Apotex Fermentation Inc v Merck & Co Inc. and Merck Canada Inc. 2015 FCA 171. The content of this article is intended to p......
  • Generic Ordered To Pay $1.7 Million In Accounting Of Profits
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 24, 2013
    ...March 12, 2013, the Federal Court released its decision in Apotex Inc. v. H. Lundbeck A/S, 2013 FC 192. The Court dismissed Apotex's action to impeach Lundbeck's Canadian Patent No. 1,339,452 and declared the patent valid and infringed by Apotex. Among other things, the Court addressed the ......