Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeNordheimer,McKinnon,Strathy
Date08 November 2018
Citation2018 ONCA 890
Docket NumberC65118, C65129
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 15 ' 19, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 22, 2022
    ...Bruning, [1964] S.C.R. 49 , AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2006 SCC 49 , Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, Harris v. GlaxoSmithKline, 2010 ONCA 872 , Peck v. Hindes (1898), 15 R.P.C. 113 (Q.B.D.), Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 5 - 9, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 15, 2018
    ...Council (197), [1978] AC 728, Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 73, Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 Keywords: Intellectual Property, Patents, Promise Doctrine, Civil Procedure, Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Collateral Atta......
  • Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 66 No. 3, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...l'interpretation du droit entre les provinces, voir les notes 259-64 du present article. (206) Voir Apotex Inc v Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 aux para 25-32; Hockin v Bank of British Columbia (1995), 123 DLR (4e) 538 aux para 22-36, 3 BCLR (3e) 193 (BCCA); Oberlander c Canada (PG), 2......
  • Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 27, 2023
    ...of Civil Litigation 243. [19] ADVANCE \r 1 [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77. [20] [2001] 2 S.C.R. 460. [21] See also: Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corp., 2018 ONCA 890; Amtim Capital Inc. v. Appliance Recycling Centres of America, 2014 ONCA 62; Penner v. Niagara (Regional Police Services Board), 2013 SCC [22]......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 27, 2023
    ...of Civil Litigation 243. [19] ADVANCE \r 1 [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77. [20] [2001] 2 S.C.R. 460. [21] See also: Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corp., 2018 ONCA 890; Amtim Capital Inc. v. Appliance Recycling Centres of America, 2014 ONCA 62; Penner v. Niagara (Regional Police Services Board), 2013 SCC [22]......
  • Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilly Canada Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 8, 2021
    ... Limitations Act , 2002.[3] [67] This issue has arisen in other Apotex and related litigation. In Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, 143 O.R. (3d) 321 , a case raising similar monopolies claims, the Court of Appeal agreed that the validity of the patent is “central” to the......
  • R. v. Henry, 2019 ONSC 4978
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 23, 2019
    ...dictum is a comment made during a judicial opinion that is unnecessary to the decision in the case: Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, 143 O.R. (3d) 321, at para. 29; R. v. Webber (2004), 13 M.V.R. (5th) 136 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 18. In G. v. Ontario, the conclusion that SO......
  • Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • November 23, 2020
    ...to be applied: see, for example, Oberlander v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 52, at para. 22; Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, at para. 27. I need not say more in the context of the present case, as any further comments would be pure obiter. [53] As an alternative a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 66 No. 3, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...l'interpretation du droit entre les provinces, voir les notes 259-64 du present article. (206) Voir Apotex Inc v Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 aux para 25-32; Hockin v Bank of British Columbia (1995), 123 DLR (4e) 538 aux para 22-36, 3 BCLR (3e) 193 (BCCA); Oberlander c Canada (PG), 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT