Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Nordheimer,McKinnon,Strathy |
Date | 08 November 2018 |
Citation | 2018 ONCA 890 |
Docket Number | C65118, C65129 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 15 ' 19, 2022)
...Bruning, [1964] S.C.R. 49 , AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2006 SCC 49 , Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, Harris v. GlaxoSmithKline, 2010 ONCA 872 , Peck v. Hindes (1898), 15 R.P.C. 113 (Q.B.D.), Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 5 - 9, 2018)
...Council (197), [1978] AC 728, Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 73, Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 Keywords: Intellectual Property, Patents, Promise Doctrine, Civil Procedure, Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Collateral Atta......
-
Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
...l'interpretation du droit entre les provinces, voir les notes 259-64 du present article. (206) Voir Apotex Inc v Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 aux para 25-32; Hockin v Bank of British Columbia (1995), 123 DLR (4e) 538 aux para 22-36, 3 BCLR (3e) 193 (BCCA); Oberlander c Canada (PG), 2......
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
...of Civil Litigation 243. [19] ADVANCE \r 1 [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77. [20] [2001] 2 S.C.R. 460. [21] See also: Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corp., 2018 ONCA 890; Amtim Capital Inc. v. Appliance Recycling Centres of America, 2014 ONCA 62; Penner v. Niagara (Regional Police Services Board), 2013 SCC [22]......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
...of Civil Litigation 243. [19] ADVANCE \r 1 [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77. [20] [2001] 2 S.C.R. 460. [21] See also: Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corp., 2018 ONCA 890; Amtim Capital Inc. v. Appliance Recycling Centres of America, 2014 ONCA 62; Penner v. Niagara (Regional Police Services Board), 2013 SCC [22]......
-
Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilly Canada Inc.,
... Limitations Act , 2002.[3] [67] This issue has arisen in other Apotex and related litigation. In Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, 143 O.R. (3d) 321 , a case raising similar monopolies claims, the Court of Appeal agreed that the validity of the patent is “central” to the......
-
R. v. Henry, 2019 ONSC 4978
...dictum is a comment made during a judicial opinion that is unnecessary to the decision in the case: Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, 143 O.R. (3d) 321, at para. 29; R. v. Webber (2004), 13 M.V.R. (5th) 136 (Ont. S.C.), at para. 18. In G. v. Ontario, the conclusion that SO......
-
Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202
...to be applied: see, for example, Oberlander v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 52, at para. 22; Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, at para. 27. I need not say more in the context of the present case, as any further comments would be pure obiter. [53] As an alternative a......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 15 ' 19, 2022)
...Bruning, [1964] S.C.R. 49 , AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2006 SCC 49 , Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890, Harris v. GlaxoSmithKline, 2010 ONCA 872 , Peck v. Hindes (1898), 15 R.P.C. 113 (Q.B.D.), Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 5 - 9, 2018)
...Council (197), [1978] AC 728, Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 73, Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 Apotex Inc. v. Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 Keywords: Intellectual Property, Patents, Promise Doctrine, Civil Procedure, Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Collateral Atta......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Allows Sanofi And Schering To Plead That Federal Court Ramipril Patent Invalidity Decision Was Flawed Due To 'Promise Doctrine'
...Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v Apotex Inc., 2017 SCC 36 [AstraZeneca]: Apotex Inc. v Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890. Background The litigation relates to Canadian Patent No. 1,341,206 ("206 patent"), owned by Schering, and the drug ramipril (ALTACE), previously......
-
Ontario Court of Appeal allows Sanofi and Schering to plead that Federal Court ramipril patent invalidity decision was flawed due to “promise doctrine”
...v Apotex Inc., 2017 SCC 36 [AstraZeneca]: Apotex Inc. v Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890. Background The litigation relates to Canadian Patent No. 1,341,206 (“206 patent”), owned by Schering, and the drug ramipril (ALTACE), previously marketed by Sanofi. In 2009, applying the “promise do......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Les impasses theoriques et pratiques du Controle de constitutionnalite canadien.
...l'interpretation du droit entre les provinces, voir les notes 259-64 du present article. (206) Voir Apotex Inc v Schering Corporation, 2018 ONCA 890 aux para 25-32; Hockin v Bank of British Columbia (1995), 123 DLR (4e) 538 aux para 22-36, 3 BCLR (3e) 193 (BCCA); Oberlander c Canada (PG), 2......