Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis |
| Citation | [2002] 4 SCR 153,2002 SCC 77,219 DLR (4th) 660,235 FTR 204,296 NR 130,[2002] ACS no 78,21 CPR (4th) 499,[2002] SCJ No 78 (QL) |
| Date | 05 December 2002 |
| Docket Number | 28287 |
| Subject Matter | PATENTS OF INVENTION,FOOD AND DRUG CONTROL,PRACTICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
62 practice notes
-
Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents)
...Co., [1948] S.C.R. 46; Tennessee Eastman Co. v. Commissioner of Patents, [1974] S.C.R. 111; Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153, 2002 SCC 77; Grant of European patent No. 0 169 672 (Onco‑mouse/Harvard) (1992), OJ EPO 1992, Statutes and Regulations Cited Act to Encou......
-
Nova Chemicals Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.
...Teva Canada Ltd. v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2012 SCC 60 , [2012] 3 S.C.R. 625 ; Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., 2002 SCC 77 , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153; Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19 ; Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v. Apotex Inc. (2001), 10 C.P.R. (4th) 151 ; Labo......
-
Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc.
... [2008] UKHL 49 ; Saint‑Gobain PAM SA v. Fusion Provida Ltd., [2005] EWCA Civ 177 (BAILII); Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153, 2002 SCC 77 ; Ciba‑Geigy AG v. Commissioner of Patents (1982), 65 C.P.R. (2d) 73 ; May & Baker Ltd. v. Boots Pure Drug Co. (1950......
-
Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.
...Foundation Ltd. (1998), 145 F.T.R. 161 ; 79 C.P.R.(3d) 193 (T.D.), affd. [2001] 1 F.C. 495 ; 262 N.R. 137 (F.C.A.), affd. [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153; 296 N.R. 130 ; 2002 SCC 77 , refd to. [para. Windsurfing International Inc. v. Bic Sports Inc. (1985), 63 N.R. 218 ; 8 C.P.R.(3d) 241 (F.......
Get Started for Free
52 cases
-
Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents)
...Co., [1948] S.C.R. 46; Tennessee Eastman Co. v. Commissioner of Patents, [1974] S.C.R. 111; Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153, 2002 SCC 77; Grant of European patent No. 0 169 672 (Onco‑mouse/Harvard) (1992), OJ EPO 1992, Statutes and Regulations Cited Act to Encou......
-
Nova Chemicals Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.
...Teva Canada Ltd. v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2012 SCC 60 , [2012] 3 S.C.R. 625 ; Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., 2002 SCC 77 , [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153; Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19 ; Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v. Apotex Inc. (2001), 10 C.P.R. (4th) 151 ; Labo......
-
Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc.
... [2008] UKHL 49 ; Saint‑Gobain PAM SA v. Fusion Provida Ltd., [2005] EWCA Civ 177 (BAILII); Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153, 2002 SCC 77 ; Ciba‑Geigy AG v. Commissioner of Patents (1982), 65 C.P.R. (2d) 73 ; May & Baker Ltd. v. Boots Pure Drug Co. (1950......
-
Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.
...Foundation Ltd. (1998), 145 F.T.R. 161 ; 79 C.P.R.(3d) 193 (T.D.), affd. [2001] 1 F.C. 495 ; 262 N.R. 137 (F.C.A.), affd. [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153; 296 N.R. 130 ; 2002 SCC 77 , refd to. [para. Windsurfing International Inc. v. Bic Sports Inc. (1985), 63 N.R. 218 ; 8 C.P.R.(3d) 241 (F.......
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
The Federal Court Of Appeal Recently Released An Important Decision On The Doctrine Of Sound Prediction (Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc. 2009 FCA 97)
...The Test for Sound Prediction The court referred to the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd [2002] SCC 77, which provided a three-fold test for the of sound prediction: There must be a factual basis for the prediction. The inventor must have, at......
-
Can An Artificial Intelligence System Be An Inventor?
...11, 2019. 12 See Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., 2002 SCC 77 at para. 96: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2002/2002scc77/2002scc77.html#par96 The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought ......
-
Eli Lilly Patent for Atomoxetine for use in Treating ADHD Invalid for Lack of Utility
...Patents Although Lilly attempted to rely on the Supreme Court decision in Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., 2002 SCC 77, 21 C.P.R. (4th) 499 ("AZT") in support of the argument that the decision of the Patent Commissioner to approve the '735 Patent should be entitled to a degree of de......
-
The Supreme Court Of Canada Rejects The Promise Doctrine And Confirms The Correct Approach For Utility Determination
...v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2008 FCA 108, [2009] 1 F.C.R. 253 (Ranbaxy) 3 Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., 2002 SCC 77, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153 4 Re Application of Abitibi Co. (1982), 62 C.P.R. (2d) 81, (Patent Appeal Board and Commissioner of The content of this article is intended......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Patents
...56 671905 Alberta Inc. v. Q’Max Solutions Inc. , 2003 FCA 241 at [32] [ Q’Max ], applying Apotex Ltd. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd ., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153 at [109], aff’g on other grounds (2000), 10 C.P.R. (4th) 65 (Fed. C.A.) [ Wellcome I ]; compare Beloit , above note 54 at 28–29 (Fed. T......
-
Management and Enforcement
...Ltd. (1998), 79 C.P.R. (3d) 193 (Fed. T.D.), aff’d on this point (2000), 10 C.P.R. (4th) 65 at 93 (Fed. C.A.), not appealed [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153 (patent) [ Apotex ]. 100 Kraft , above note 62 (SCC) (copyright); see section B(3)(c), “Licensee’s Right to Sue,” in this chapter. 101 Murray (......
-
Table of Cases
...v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd. (Fed. C.A., 1995). See Wellcome Foundation Ltd. v. Apotex Inc. Apotex Ltd. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153, 2002 SCC 77 , 21 C.P.R. (4th) 499 , aff’g (2000), 262 N.R. 137 , 10 C.P.R. (4th) 65 , [2000] F.C.J. No. 1770 (C.A.), rev’g in part (1......
-
Intellectual Property: An Overview
...refused, [2002] S.C.C.A. No. 189. Patent: Apotex Ltd. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd. (2000), 10 C.P.R. (4th) 65 at 84 (Fed. C.A.), aff’d [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153. 118 But see Volkswagen Canada Inc. v. Access International Automotive Ltd ., 2001 FCA 79; Euro-Excellence Inc. v. Kraft Canada Inc. , 20......