Appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada

AuthorBrian H Greenspan/Vincenzo Rondinelli/Jonathan Dawe/Maureen McGuire/Michael Dineen/Mark Halfyard
Pages141-171
141
Appeals to the
Supreme Court
of Canada
11
I. Introduction.............................................. 142
II. The Court’s Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters.................... 142
A. Appeals as of Right .................................. 146
B. Appeals with Leave................................... 150
III. Supreme Court of Canada Procedure ......................... 151
A. Ottawa Agents ...................................... 151
B. The Leave Application ................................ 152
C. The Notice of Appeal ................................. 159
D. Appeals as of Right .................................. 160
E. The Appeal Process and Timeline ....................... 160
IV. Bail Pending a Leave Application or Appeal..................... 164
V. Interventions............................................. 165
VI. The Appeal Factum ........................................ 168
VII. The Hearing.............................................. 169
VIII. Powers of the Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal.............. 170
Copyright © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.
142 Criminal Appeals
I. Introduction
The Supreme Court of Canada sits as the highest court of appeal in both civil and
criminal cases. Although it can hear appeals directly from criminal trial court deci-
sions in certain exceptional situations (see Chapter 1, The Nature of an Appeal and
Statutory Jurisdiction), nearly all criminal cases that reach the Court do so in the form
of appeals from decisions by a provincial or territorial court of appeal. As discussed in
Chapter 1, in most circumstances only the party who loses in the result in the court of
appeal can initiate a further appeal to the Supreme Court, although there are excep-
tions to this general rule in some constitutional cases. Third parties who are aected
by rulings in criminal cases can also sometimes appeal directly to the Supreme Court.
Most appellants must obtain leave to appeal before their appeal is allowed to proceed
further and be decided on the merits. However, as discussed below, the Criminal Code1
allows some appeals in indictable matters to be brought to the Supreme Court “as of
right,” without f‌irst obtaining leave.
II. The Court’s Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters
Like the provincial and territorial courts of appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada is a
court of statutory jurisdiction that can only hear and decide appeals when it is author-
ized to do so by legislation. The Court’s main sources of jurisdiction in indictable
criminal matters are found in part XXI of the Criminal Code. Sections 691 to 696
authorize the Court to hear appeals from decisions by the provincial and territorial
courts of appeal in indictable appeal matters other than sentence appeals (e.g., con-
viction appeals, Crown appeals against acquittals or stays of proceedings, and appeals
against verdicts of “not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder”
[NCR-MD] and f‌indings of unf‌itness to stand trial). The Criminal Code provisions
only give rights of appeal to the party who has lost in the result in the court of appeal,
who may have been either the appellant or the respondent in the original appeal.
These Criminal Code provisions are supplemented by section 40 of the Supreme
Court Act,2 which gives the Supreme Court jurisdiction to hear appeals “from any
f‌inal or other judgment” of “the highest court of f‌inal resort in a province in which
judgment can be had in the particular case sought to be appealed.” The Court has
interpreted section 40 broadly and held that it applies whenever no other statutory
right of appeal exists, including in criminal matters where no right of appeal to the
Court is provided by the Criminal Code, such as in sentence appeals and appeals in
summary conviction matters.3 The Court has also found that section 40 gives it
1 RSC 1985, c C-46.
2 RSC 1985, c S-26.
3 See e.g. R v Krymowski, 2005 SCC 7 with regard to summary conviction appeals; R v Gardiner,
[1982] 2 SCR 368, 1982 CanLII 30 with regard to sentence appeals.
Copyright © 2025 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex