Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle |
| Docket Number | 40166 |
| Date | 11 October 2024 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2024 SCC 31 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
23 practice notes
-
Scott v. Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc.
...by the Limitations Act , 2002. The principles of the corporate attribution doctrine, summarized in Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31, apply to one-person corporations. The Court of Appeal appropriately exercised its discretion to refuse to attribute L’s knowledge to the com......
-
Scott v Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc.
...by the Limitations Act , 2002. The principles of the corporate attribution doctrine, summarized in Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31, apply to one-person corporations. The Court of Appeal appropriately exercised its discretion to refuse to attribute L's knowledge to the com......
-
Piekut v Canada (National Revenue)
...to: Damache (Syndic de), 2012 QCCA 2014; Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31; Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), 2024 SCC 28; Jerrard v. Peacock (1985), 37 Alta. L.R. (2d) 197; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Lt......
-
Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue)
...to: Damache (Syndic de), 2012 QCCA 2014; Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31; Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), 2024 SCC 28; Jerrard v. Peacock (1985), 37 Alta. L.R. (2d) 197; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Lt......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
Scott v. Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc.
...by the Limitations Act , 2002. The principles of the corporate attribution doctrine, summarized in Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31, apply to one-person corporations. The Court of Appeal appropriately exercised its discretion to refuse to attribute L’s knowledge to the com......
-
Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue)
...to: Damache (Syndic de), 2012 QCCA 2014; Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31; Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), 2024 SCC 28; Jerrard v. Peacock (1985), 37 Alta. L.R. (2d) 197; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Lt......
-
Piekut v Canada (National Revenue)
...to: Damache (Syndic de), 2012 QCCA 2014; Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31; Poonian v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), 2024 SCC 28; Jerrard v. Peacock (1985), 37 Alta. L.R. (2d) 197; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Lt......
-
Scott v Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc.
...by the Limitations Act , 2002. The principles of the corporate attribution doctrine, summarized in Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31, apply to one-person corporations. The Court of Appeal appropriately exercised its discretion to refuse to attribute L's knowledge to the com......
Get Started for Free
9 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 10 ' 14, 2025)
...Ault v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 ONCA 147, Ingles v. Tutkaluk Construction Ltd., 2000 SCC 12, Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31, Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2012 SCC 51, Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., 2002 SCC 18, Business Develop......
-
Corporate Minds Do Not All Think Alike: The Supreme Court Affirms A Purposive Approach To The Corporate Attribution Doctrine
...in the criminal context and in the civil context.2 Two recent decisions of the Supreme Court ' Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31 and Scott v. Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc., 2024 SCC 32 ' now provide for the application of the doctrine in the insolvency law space. Aquino v B......
-
Go Rogue, Go Broke: Refining Corporate Responsibility In Insolvency: Aquino V Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31 And Scott V Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc., 2024 SCC 32
...applies, particularly when a director's misconduct has driven the company into insolvency. In Aquino v Bondfield Construction Co., 2024 SCC 31 [Aquino], and Scott v Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc. [Golden Oaks], 2024 SCC 32, the Supreme Court addressed cases where fraudulent actions by senior ......
-
Supreme Court Of Canada Clarifies When Fraud By Senior Management Will Be Attributed To A Corporation
...v. Bondfield Construction Co. 2024 SCC 31, the Supreme Court of Canada provided clarity about when fraud by a corporation's directing mind can be attributed to the In Aquino v. Bondfield Construction Co. 2024 SCC 31, the Supreme Court of Canada provided clarity about when fraud by a corpora......
Get Started for Free