AR v JU,
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Michelle Crighton,The Honourable Justice L. Bernette Ho |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 337 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 337 |
| Date | 08 October 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 2001-0132AC; 2101-0058AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Gray v Goguen,
...in their consideration of two appeals taken from post-trial case management decisions involving the same parties. In AR v JU, 2021, ABCA 337, the Court of Appeal described the Poelman J decision in the following terms (at para 89): Poelman J found this to be a high conflict parenting ......
-
Mog v Cog,
...eg Shehu v Iqbal, 2017 ABCA 438 at para 7, 66 Alta LR (6th) 228; R v Lofstrom, 2017 ABCA 211 at para 10, 56 Alta. L.R. (6th) 52; AR v JU, 2021 ABCA 337 at paras 50-57, 64 RFL (8th) 3 The parties did not seriously dispute that the content reflected her fact findings. The parties disputed in ......
2 cases
-
Gray v Goguen,
...in their consideration of two appeals taken from post-trial case management decisions involving the same parties. In AR v JU, 2021, ABCA 337, the Court of Appeal described the Poelman J decision in the following terms (at para 89): Poelman J found this to be a high conflict parenting ......
-
Mog v Cog,
...eg Shehu v Iqbal, 2017 ABCA 438 at para 7, 66 Alta LR (6th) 228; R v Lofstrom, 2017 ABCA 211 at para 10, 56 Alta. L.R. (6th) 52; AR v JU, 2021 ABCA 337 at paras 50-57, 64 RFL (8th) 3 The parties did not seriously dispute that the content reflected her fact findings. The parties disputed in ......