AR v JU
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Michelle Crighton,The Honourable Justice L. Bernette Ho |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 337 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 337 |
| Docket Number | 2001-0132AC; 2101-0058AC |
| Date | 08 October 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 practice notes
-
Gray v Goguen
...in their consideration of two appeals taken from post-trial case management decisions involving the same parties.  In AR v JU, 2021, ABCA 337, the Court of Appeal described the Poelman J decision in the following terms (at para 89): Poelman J found this to be a high conflict parenting ......
4 cases
-
Gray v Goguen, 2022 ABQB 273
...in their consideration of two appeals taken from post-trial case management decisions involving the same parties.  In AR v JU, 2021, ABCA 337, the Court of Appeal described the Poelman J decision in the following terms (at para 89): Poelman J found this to be a high conflict parenting ......
-
Mog v Cog
...eg Shehu v Iqbal, 2017 ABCA 438 at para 7, 66 Alta LR (6th) 228; R v Lofstrom, 2017 ABCA 211 at para 10, 56 Alta. L.R. (6th) 52; AR v JU, 2021 ABCA 337 at paras 50-57, 64 RFL (8th) 3 The parties did not seriously dispute that the content reflected her fact findings. The parties disputed in ......
-
Grandison v Kazakawich
...the power to order costs as a tool in the furtherance of the efficient and orderly administration of justice: LY, at para 11; AR v. JU, 2021 ABCA 337 at para 242 Pursuant to rule 10.31(5), in appropriate circumstances, the Court may order, in a costs award, payment to a self-represented lit......
-
Kennedy v Slusar
...not sufficient. The Court of Appeal of Alberta described the threshold requirement to vary a parenting order in its decision of AR v JU, 2021 ABCA 337 at para 66: A ‘change in the needs or circumstances of the child’ is not established by showing that there has been a significant event or e......