ASHLEY DAWN HECK (MESZAROS) v. MICHAEL LEE MESZAROS, 2020 SKQB 230
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | MEGAW J. |
Citation | 2020 SKQB 230 |
Date | 17 September 2020 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Docket Number | DIV 410 of 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...2012 MBQB 145; EAM v ADM, 2014 NBQB 216; T(KM) v P(JMP), 2018 NWTSC 16; Catizzone v Cowell, 2016 ONSC 5297; Heck (Meszaros) v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230. 173 APGP v MSP, 2013 ONSC 174 Stec v Blair, 2021 ONSC 6212 at para 23. 175 Ascani v Keedi, 2021 ONSC 4282, citing Najjardizaji v Mehrjerdi, ......
-
ASHLEY DAWN HECK (MESZAROS) v. MICHAEL LEE MESZAROS,
...matters contained in the various applications were dealt with directly by way of judgments dated June 30, 2020 and September 17, 2020 (2020 SKQB 230) [September 2020 judgment], and thereby resolved. These aspects included the mother’s request to have the father’s parenting tim......
-
S.E.P. v D.P.P.,
...is not permitted in family matters. Instead, the court directs the matter to a pre-trial conference and trial (Heck v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230 at para. 87). [25] In Heck, the court explained why cross-examination in family law matters is not permitte......
-
HECK v. MESZAROS,
...lives. The background to the litigation, and really to their lives, exists in a few judgments of this Court: 2019 SKQB 21; 2020 SKQB 230; 2021 SKQB [2] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
ASHLEY DAWN HECK (MESZAROS) v. MICHAEL LEE MESZAROS,
...matters contained in the various applications were dealt with directly by way of judgments dated June 30, 2020 and September 17, 2020 (2020 SKQB 230) [September 2020 judgment], and thereby resolved. These aspects included the mother’s request to have the father’s parenting tim......
-
S.E.P. v D.P.P.,
...is not permitted in family matters. Instead, the court directs the matter to a pre-trial conference and trial (Heck v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230 at para. 87). [25] In Heck, the court explained why cross-examination in family law matters is not permitte......
-
HECK v. MESZAROS,
...lives. The background to the litigation, and really to their lives, exists in a few judgments of this Court: 2019 SKQB 21; 2020 SKQB 230; 2021 SKQB [2] ......
-
B.J.V. v. K.T.J.,
...issues and to prevent the possibility of physical and/or sexual abuse of a child. See for example Heck (Meszaros) v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230 at para 63. In my view, it is not required in this [36] ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...2012 MBQB 145; EAM v ADM, 2014 NBQB 216; T(KM) v P(JMP), 2018 NWTSC 16; Catizzone v Cowell, 2016 ONSC 5297; Heck (Meszaros) v Meszaros, 2020 SKQB 230. 173 APGP v MSP, 2013 ONSC 174 Stec v Blair, 2021 ONSC 6212 at para 23. 175 Ascani v Keedi, 2021 ONSC 4282, citing Najjardizaji v Mehrjerdi, ......