ASICS Corporation v. 9153-2267 Québec inc.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2017 FC 5 |
| Date | 06 January 2017 |
| Subject Matter | CONTEMPT |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
Self-Incrimination
...v Darrach , [2000] 2 SCR 443 at para 66 [ Darrach ]. 40 R v Nedelcu , [2012] 3 SCR 311 [ Nedelcu ]. 41 ASICS Corp v 9153-2267 Quebec Inc , 2017 FC 5. 42 R v Ervin , 2003 ABCA 179 [ Ervin ]; R v Chu , 2016 SKQB 157. 43 Nedelcu , above note 40 at para 81. THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 392 will not use ......
-
Table of cases
...Ares v Venner, [1970] SCR 608 ..............................................................216–17, 218 ASICS Corp v 9153-2267 Quebec Inc, 2017 FC 5................................................391 Augustine Estate v Inco, 2006 CanLII 21783 (Ont SCJ) ............................ 218, 220 ......
-
Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission)
...order compels: Carey v Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 (CanLII), [2015] 2 SCR 79 at paras 32 to 35 [Carey]; ASICS Corporation v 9153-2267 Québec inc., 2017 FC 5 at para 32 [ASICS]. [49] With respect to the third element, all that is required to establish civil contempt is proof beyond a reasonable doub......
-
Bellegarde v. Eashappie
...not create an additional requirement to establish an intention to disobey (Carey at para 38; ASICS Corporation v 9153-2267 Québec Inc, 2017 FC 5 at para 33). [62] A reasonable doubt must be based upon reason and common sense, and must be logically connected to the evidence or the absen......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Hughes v. Canada (Human Rights Commission)
...order compels: Carey v Laiken, 2015 SCC 17 (CanLII), [2015] 2 SCR 79 at paras 32 to 35 [Carey]; ASICS Corporation v 9153-2267 Québec inc., 2017 FC 5 at para 32 [ASICS]. [49] With respect to the third element, all that is required to establish civil contempt is proof beyond a reasonable doub......
-
Sakab Saudi Holding Company v. Saad Khalid S Al Jabri
...Mackenzie J., Merck & Co. v. Apotex Inc., [1996] 2 FC 223, para. 49, per McKay J. (FC TD), ASICS Corp. v. 9153-2267 Québec inc., 2017 FC 5 (FC TD).  These authorities have not been overruled by Nedelco, Henry and Dubois (cited in the previous two [30] McClure v. Backstein, [19......
-
Canadian Standards Association v. P.S. Knight Co. Ltd.
...in the sense of desiring or knowingly choosing to disobey the order or judgment in question (ASICS Corporation v 9153-2267 Québec Inc, 2017 FC 5 at para 33, citing Carey at paras 39-42, 47), in my view, the Knight Parties have chosen to disobey the Judgment. It is clear from the conten......
-
Sakab Daudi Holding Company v. Al Jabri
...s. 13 of the Charter. See Merck, at para. 49. [74]        In ASICS Corp. v. 9153-2267 Québec inc. 2017 F.C. 5, the plaintiff brought a motion for contempt of court against the defendant and its officer after obtaining a default judgment enjoining the ......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Intellectual Property Litigation: 2017 Year In Review
...36 Ibid at para 32 [citations omitted]. 37 ASICS Corp v 9153-2267 Québec Inc., 2017 FC 257 [ASICS]. 38 ASICS Corp v 9153-2267 Québec Inc., 2017 FC 5. 39 ASICS, supra note 37 at para 40 Ibid at para 83-86. 41 Ibid at para 87. 42 Ibid at para 96. 43 Lam v Chanel S De RL, 2017 FCA 38 aff'g 201......
-
Defendant And Others Found To Have Shown Cause As To Why They Should Not Be Held In Contempt Of Court (Intellectual Property Weekly Abstracts - Week Of January 23, 2017)
...and others found to have shown cause as to why they should not be held in contempt of court ASICS Corporate v. 9153-2267 Québec inc., 2017 FC 5 This decision considered whether the Defendant, its President, its Vice-present (referred to collectively as the "Two Individuals") and a corporate......
2 books & journal articles
-
Self-Incrimination
...v Darrach , [2000] 2 SCR 443 at para 66 [ Darrach ]. 40 R v Nedelcu , [2012] 3 SCR 311 [ Nedelcu ]. 41 ASICS Corp v 9153-2267 Quebec Inc , 2017 FC 5. 42 R v Ervin , 2003 ABCA 179 [ Ervin ]; R v Chu , 2016 SKQB 157. 43 Nedelcu , above note 40 at para 81. THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 392 will not use ......
-
Table of cases
...Ares v Venner, [1970] SCR 608 ..............................................................216–17, 218 ASICS Corp v 9153-2267 Quebec Inc, 2017 FC 5................................................391 Augustine Estate v Inco, 2006 CanLII 21783 (Ont SCJ) ............................ 218, 220 ......