Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 262

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice K.D. Nixon
Citation2018 ABQB 262
Date05 April 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1501 00395
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Métis Nation of Alberta Association v Alberta (Indigenous Relations),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 4 Enero 2022
    ...as long as the policy conforms to legal limits: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 401 at para 50, aff’g 2018 ABQB 262 (“Athabasca”). It argues that forming a policy is political in nature, citing Hayes and Jacobs v Smallwood et al, 2000 BCSC 1665 at ......
  • Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 401
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 22 Octubre 2019
    ...Appeal from the Order by The Honourable Madam Justice K.D. Nixon Dated the 5th day of April, 2018 Filed on the 4th day of May, 2018 (2018 ABQB 262, Docket: 1501 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment ___________________________________________________......
  • Anderson v Canada (Minster of Employment, Workforce and Labour), 2018 ABQB 839
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Octubre 2018
    ...Declaratory Judgments, 4th ed (Toronto: Thompson Reuters, 2016)). [13] In the recent case of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 262, Nixon J considered both the law of declaratory judgments and mootness, as set out in Borowski v Canada (Attorney General), [1989] 1 SCR 342......
  • Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) v JI,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Diciembre 2020
    ...can be saved. See Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Relations, Aboriginal Consultation Office), 2018 ABQB 262 at paras 49-52, for an example of this type of approach being used before. [75] Therefore, the following grounds from the Notice of Appeal will not ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 401
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 22 Octubre 2019
    ...Appeal from the Order by The Honourable Madam Justice K.D. Nixon Dated the 5th day of April, 2018 Filed on the 4th day of May, 2018 (2018 ABQB 262, Docket: 1501 _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Judgment ___________________________________________________......
  • Métis Nation of Alberta Association v Alberta (Indigenous Relations),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 4 Enero 2022
    ...as long as the policy conforms to legal limits: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 401 at para 50, aff’g 2018 ABQB 262 (“Athabasca”). It argues that forming a policy is political in nature, citing Hayes and Jacobs v Smallwood et al, 2000 BCSC 1665 at ......
  • Anderson v Canada (Minster of Employment, Workforce and Labour), 2018 ABQB 839
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Octubre 2018
    ...Declaratory Judgments, 4th ed (Toronto: Thompson Reuters, 2016)). [13] In the recent case of Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 262, Nixon J considered both the law of declaratory judgments and mootness, as set out in Borowski v Canada (Attorney General), [1989] 1 SCR 342......
  • Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) v JI,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 Diciembre 2020
    ...can be saved. See Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta (Minister of Aboriginal Relations, Aboriginal Consultation Office), 2018 ABQB 262 at paras 49-52, for an example of this type of approach being used before. [75] Therefore, the following grounds from the Notice of Appeal will not ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Case Law Summaries – Aboriginal Law
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 22 Marzo 2019
    ...CHIPEWYAN FIRST NATION V. ALBERTA, 2018 ABQB 262 In this case, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench judicially reviewed a decision of the Aboriginal Consultation Office (ACO) that the duty to consult with the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation was not triggered in relation to the Grand Rapids p......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT