Aubin v Petrone

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Martin,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan
Citation2020 ABCA 13
Docket Number1803-0223-AC; 1803-0331-AC; 1803-0350-AC
Date14 January 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
49 practice notes
  • Savoie v. Lambert
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 11, 2024
    ...Advisory Guidelines Revised Users Guide (Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, 2016) [RUG] may also be considered: Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 at para 38. [287] The parties cohabited from 1989 until separation in February 2012, or approximately 23 years. At the time of separation, the par......
  • Ward v. Murphy
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 16, 2022
    ...759; Armoyan v. Armoyan, 2013 NSCA 99; Daigle v. Mark’s Work Wearhouse Ltd., 2022 NSCA 5; Jiang v. Shi, 2017 BCCA 232; Aubin v. Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13; Walker v. Walker, 2019 SKCA 96; MacLennan v. MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132; J.O. v. M.C., 2017 NBCA 15; Riel v. Holland (2003), 67 O.R. (3d) 417;......
  • A.E v. A.E.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 13, 2021
    ...[1992] 2 S.C.R. 112 (S.C.C.), at para. 15; Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25 (S.C.C.), at para. 29; Mason, at para. 68; Aubin v. Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 (C.A.), at para. 135; Bodine-Shah v. Shah, 2014 BCCA 191 (C.A.), at para. 66). The term also encompasses the capacity of a party to earn income ......
  • H2 Canmore Apartments LP v. Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 15, 2024
    ...1999 CanLIIDocs 184 at 86), an “equitable wrong” (DBDC Spadina at para 211 (Title of section B1), an “equitable remedy” (Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 at para 188 (Feehan JA dissenting in part), leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2020 CanLII 41791) including one that can give rise to a constru......
  • Get Started for Free
45 cases
  • Savoie v. Lambert
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 11, 2024
    ...Advisory Guidelines Revised Users Guide (Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada, 2016) [RUG] may also be considered: Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 at para 38. [287] The parties cohabited from 1989 until separation in February 2012, or approximately 23 years. At the time of separation, the par......
  • Ward v. Murphy
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 16, 2022
    ...759; Armoyan v. Armoyan, 2013 NSCA 99; Daigle v. Mark’s Work Wearhouse Ltd., 2022 NSCA 5; Jiang v. Shi, 2017 BCCA 232; Aubin v. Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13; Walker v. Walker, 2019 SKCA 96; MacLennan v. MacLennan, 2021 SKCA 132; J.O. v. M.C., 2017 NBCA 15; Riel v. Holland (2003), 67 O.R. (3d) 417;......
  • A.E v. A.E.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 13, 2021
    ...[1992] 2 S.C.R. 112 (S.C.C.), at para. 15; Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25 (S.C.C.), at para. 29; Mason, at para. 68; Aubin v. Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 (C.A.), at para. 135; Bodine-Shah v. Shah, 2014 BCCA 191 (C.A.), at para. 66). The term also encompasses the capacity of a party to earn income ......
  • H2 Canmore Apartments LP v. Cormode & Dickson Construction Edmonton Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 15, 2024
    ...1999 CanLIIDocs 184 at 86), an “equitable wrong” (DBDC Spadina at para 211 (Title of section B1), an “equitable remedy” (Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 at para 188 (Feehan JA dissenting in part), leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2020 CanLII 41791) including one that can give rise to a constru......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • The Overlay Of A Matrimonial Dispute On The Oppression Remedy Under The Business Corporations Act
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 6, 2021
    ...Decision The Court begins by quoting cases in which family law intersected with corporate law. The Court notes that, per Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13, "obligations imposed by family law are on equal footing with other legal obligations and deserve fair balancing where interests compete." T......
  • Corporate Liability As A Result Of Family Law Claim: Are You Prepared?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 26, 2021
    ...Decision The Court began by quoting cases in which family law intersected with corporate law. The Court noted that, per Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13, "obligations imposed by family law are on equal footing with other legal obligations and deserve fair balancing where interests compete." Th......
2 books & journal articles
  • CORPORATE VEIL-PIERCING AND STRUCTURES OF CANADIAN BUSINESS LAW.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 55 No. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10 at para 51; Milton v Milton, 2008 NBCA 87 at para 30; Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 at para (145) Chevron, supra note 2. (146) Ibid at para 8, Hourigan JA. (147) Ibid at para 63, Hourigan JA; para 92, Nordheimer JA, concurrin......
  • CANADIAN LITIGATION FOR VIOLATIONS OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: QUESTIONS REMAINING AFTER NEVSUN V ARAYA.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 80 No. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...of justice'] typically serve merely as shorthand for a combination of more specific justificatory factors"). Accord Aubin v Petrone, 2020 ABCA 13 at paras 50, 190 (discussing the phrase as shorthand for the fraud and agency (136) Robert Nanni, "What's in a name? Understanding "piercing the ......