Auer v. Auer
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary |
| Citation | 2024 SCC 36 |
| Date | 08 November 2024 |
| Docket Number | 40582 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
69 practice notes
-
Dr Ignacio Tan III v Alberta Veterinary Medical Association
...v Canada, 2023 SCC 21 at paras 64-77, 485 DLR (4th) 583; Ontario v Restoule, 2024 SCC 27 at paras 153-154, 494 DLR (4th) 383; Auer v Auer, 2024 SCC 36 at paras 50-51, 497 DLR (4th) 16 Returning to its analysis of the findings, notably of facts, by the Hearing Tribunal, the Council found the......
-
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General), 2025 SCC 6
...General) v. United States Steel Corp., 2011 FCA 176, 333 D.L.R. (4th) 1; Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26; Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653; Watkins v. Olafson, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750; Goodwi......
-
Telus Communications Inc. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities
...2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18; Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; Perka v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; United S......
-
Telus Communications Inc. v Federation of Canadian Municipalities
...2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18; Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; Perka v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; United S......
Get Started for Free
63 cases
-
Dr Ignacio Tan III v Alberta Veterinary Medical Association
...v Canada, 2023 SCC 21 at paras 64-77, 485 DLR (4th) 583; Ontario v Restoule, 2024 SCC 27 at paras 153-154, 494 DLR (4th) 383; Auer v Auer, 2024 SCC 36 at paras 50-51, 497 DLR (4th) 16 Returning to its analysis of the findings, notably of facts, by the Hearing Tribunal, the Council found the......
-
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General), 2025 SCC 6
...General) v. United States Steel Corp., 2011 FCA 176, 333 D.L.R. (4th) 1; Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26; Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653; Watkins v. Olafson, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750; Goodwi......
-
Telus Communications Inc. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities
...2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18; Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; Perka v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; United S......
-
Telus Communications Inc. v Federation of Canadian Municipalities
...2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18; Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; Perka v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295; United S......
Get Started for Free
6 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 20 ' 24, 2025)
...Canada (Attorney General), 2020 ONCA 688, Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation v. South Bruce Peninsula (Town), 2024 ONCA 884, Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36, Koroluk v. KPMG Inc., 2022 SKCA 57,Warde v Slatter Holdings Ltd., 2016 BCCA 63, Kuang v. Young, 2023 ONSC 2429, Quebec (Commission des droit......
-
The SCC Lowers The Legal Threshold For Challenging The Vires Of Subordinate Legislation
...only be struck down if irrelevant, extraneous, or completely unrelated to the enabling statute. In companion decisions, Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36 (Auer); TransAlta Generation Partnership v. Alberta, 2024 SCC 37 (TransAlta), the SCC resolved this uncertainty, holding that the slightly less o......
-
B.C.'s Proposed Tariff Response Risks Delaying, Not Streamlining, Natural Resource Project Approvals
...Yukon, 2012 YKCA 14 at para. 38. 13. Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo‑Services Inc., 2017 SCC 40 at para. 24. 14. See Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36 at paras. 15. Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44 at para. 13. 16. The theoretical possibility of this kind of challenge is di......
-
Supreme Court Clarifies Standard Of Review For Challenges To Subordinate Legislation
...Court of Canada recently clarified the analytical framework for challenging regulations in Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36, and its companion case, TransAlta Generation Partnership v. Alberta, 2024 SCC 37.1 These decisions resolve a split among appellate courts that we wrote about in December 202......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...208, 283 Aucoin v Aucoin (1976), 28 RFL 43 (NSCA) 82, 169, 176 Auer v Auer, 2015 ABQB 67 427 Canadian Family Law 10e.indb 670 Auer v Auer, 2024 SCC 36 146, 315 Aujla v Singh, 2012 ONSC 5217 208, 209 Austin v Austin, [2007] OJ No 4283 (Sup Ct) 395, 409 Austin v Goerz, 2007 BCCA 586 39 Authie......
-
Criteria and Objectives of Child Support
...in Chapter 6, Section B(10): “Canada Child Benefit; Eligible Dependant Tax Credit.” 22 Goldstein v Canada, 2013 TCC 165 . 23 Auer v Auer, 2024 SCC 36; Premi v Khodeir, [2009] OJ No 3365 (SCJ); see Section D(4), below in this chapter. And see Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24 at para Child S......