Aujla v. Aujla,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Justice Schultes |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 1126 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 1126 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | E53286 |
| Date | 09 June 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Ma v Liu,
...the legislature understood the difference between equitable and common law remedies when it specified the latter”: Aujla v. Aujla, 2021 BCSC 1126 at para. 154 Even if unconscionability is a factor to consider under s. 93(3)(d), I am not satisfied that it applies in this case. A ......
-
2023 BCSC 283,
...the legislature understood the difference between equitable and common law remedies when it specified the latter”: Aujla v. Aujla, 2021 BCSC 1126 at para. 154 Even if unconscionability is a factor to consider under s. 93(3)(d), I am not satisfied that it applies in this case. A ......
2 cases
-
Ma v Liu,
...the legislature understood the difference between equitable and common law remedies when it specified the latter”: Aujla v. Aujla, 2021 BCSC 1126 at para. 154 Even if unconscionability is a factor to consider under s. 93(3)(d), I am not satisfied that it applies in this case. A ......
-
2023 BCSC 283,
...the legislature understood the difference between equitable and common law remedies when it specified the latter”: Aujla v. Aujla, 2021 BCSC 1126 at para. 154 Even if unconscionability is a factor to consider under s. 93(3)(d), I am not satisfied that it applies in this case. A ......