Austin v. Bell Canada

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeMacPherson, Sharpe and Jamal JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 142
Docket NumberC67404
Date21 February 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
22 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 17 – February 21, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 2 April 2020
    ..., R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 170(12), Fault Determination Rules, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 668, R. v. Pannu, 2015 ONCA 677 Austin v. Bell Canada , 2020 ONCA 142 Keywords: Contracts, Interpretation, Contra Proferentem, Pension Plans, Class Proceedings, Summary Judgment, Class Proceedings Act , 1992,......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Pension Law. Third Edition
    • 5 August 2021
    ...[2011] SCCA No 206 ............................326, 327, 341–42, 538 Austin v Bell Canada, 2018 ONSC 4018, rev’d on other grounds, 2020 ONCA 142 ................................................................................... 130, 257 Austin v Bell Canada, 2019 ONSC 4757 ......................
  • Minimum Standards
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Pension Law. Third Edition
    • 5 August 2021
    ...in favour of former employees rather than a gratuitous beneit at the discretion of the employer: see, for example, Austin v Bell Canada , 2020 ONCA 142; Quinn v New Brunswick (Finance and Human Resources) , 2011 NBQB 182 at paras 57–96; and Dinney v Great-West Life Assurance Co , 2005 MBCA ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 4 ' 8, 2024)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 15 November 2024
    ...Electricity Distribution Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Electric Association Reciprocal Insurance Exchange, 2022 ONCA 514, Austin v. Bell, 2020 ONCA 142, Adam v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2018 BCCA 482, Beaudin v. Travelers Indemnity Insurance Company of Canada, 2021 ONSC 1389, ......
  • Get Started for Free
15 cases
  • Farrage Estate v. D’Andrea
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 31 August 2020
    ...15, 17, 20, 21-23, 25-26, 31, 34, 36, 42, 44 and 45. [42] Decision, at para. 16. [43] Decision, at para. 46. [44] Austin v. Bell Canada, 2020 ONCA 142, at para. 24. [45] Decision, at para. 44. [46] Courts of Justice Act, s. 133(b): “No appeal lies without leave of the court to which the app......
  • Real Estate Professionals Inc. v. Castel Homes Inc. et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 13 July 2023
    ...author if the choice is between him and the other party to the contract who did not participate in its drafting”: Austin v. Bell Canada, 2020 ONCA 142, at para. 31. Since Mr. Campoli drafted the ESA, any ambiguity in the wording of paragraphs 2(i) and 2(a) must be resolved against [141] In ......
  • Whitehead v. Tucker
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 29 September 2025
    ...for failing to take such evidence into account, this court has found a palpable and overriding error of fact: Austin v. Bell Canada, 2020 ONCA 142, 150 O.R. (3d) 21, at para. [58] That is what occurred here. The expert evidence proffered by the appellants’ and respondents’ experts establish......
  • Brewers Retail v. Campbell
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 10 February 2022
    ...in the pension context, are recognized causes of action and are certainly justiciable in the courts: see, e.g. Austin v. Bell Canada, 2020 ONCA 142. [22] Given that there is a recognizable cause of action in resolving a disputed interpretation of a statute, I have no hesitation in concludin......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 17 – February 21, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 2 April 2020
    ..., R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 170(12), Fault Determination Rules, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 668, R. v. Pannu, 2015 ONCA 677 Austin v. Bell Canada , 2020 ONCA 142 Keywords: Contracts, Interpretation, Contra Proferentem, Pension Plans, Class Proceedings, Summary Judgment, Class Proceedings Act , 1992,......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 4 ' 8, 2024)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 15 November 2024
    ...Electricity Distribution Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Electric Association Reciprocal Insurance Exchange, 2022 ONCA 514, Austin v. Bell, 2020 ONCA 142, Adam v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2018 BCCA 482, Beaudin v. Travelers Indemnity Insurance Company of Canada, 2021 ONSC 1389, ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 29 ' October 3, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 7 October 2025
    ...Microlec Produits Électroniques Inc., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 1065, Waxman v. Waxman, (2004) 186 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), Austin v. Bell Canada, 2020 ONCA 142, Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Corkery, 2009 ONCA 85, Chong v. Donnelly, 2019 ONCA 799, Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, Schafer v. Schafe......
  • Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation Newsletter ' April 2020
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 20 May 2020
    ...IN THIS ISSUE BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS Earl v. McAllister, 2019 ONSC 7288 INTERPRETATION OF PENSION PLAN TERMS Austin v. Bell Canada, 2020 ONCA 142 FAMILY LAW Kraft v. Kraft, 2020 BCSC 283 Miaskowski v. MacIntyre, 2020 ONCA 178 JURISDICTION OF A PENSION PLAN Canada (Attorney General) v. Nor......
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Pension Law. Third Edition
    • 5 August 2021
    ...[2011] SCCA No 206 ............................326, 327, 341–42, 538 Austin v Bell Canada, 2018 ONSC 4018, rev’d on other grounds, 2020 ONCA 142 ................................................................................... 130, 257 Austin v Bell Canada, 2019 ONSC 4757 ......................
  • Minimum Standards
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Pension Law. Third Edition
    • 5 August 2021
    ...in favour of former employees rather than a gratuitous beneit at the discretion of the employer: see, for example, Austin v Bell Canada , 2020 ONCA 142; Quinn v New Brunswick (Finance and Human Resources) , 2011 NBQB 182 at paras 57–96; and Dinney v Great-West Life Assurance Co , 2005 MBCA ......
  • Reach
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Pension Law. Third Edition
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Co , [2009] OJ No 114 (SCJ) at para 47, and most recently, Austin v Bell Canada , 2018 ONSC 4018 at para 28, rev’d on other grounds, 2020 ONCA 142. ny v Smallhorn , 2007 CanLII 55704 (Ont SC). See also, Imperial Oil Limited v Ontario (Superintendent Financial Services) , 2010 ONFST 16, wher......
  • Grammar and Punctuation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guthrie's Guide to Better Legal Writing. Second Edition
    • 5 August 2021
    ...Common Comma Crimes Committed by Counsel” (March 2016) 95 Michigan Bar Journal 40–41. 24 See Austin v Bell Canada , 2019 ONSC 4757, rev’d 2020 ONCA 142; Vitol E&P Ltd v New Age (African Global Energy) Ltd , [2018] EWHC 1580 (Comm); m 184 m Chapter Three: Grammar and Punctuation Read that En......