Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeJackson
Citation2019 SKCA 2
Docket NumberCACV3274
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date03 January 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Digest: Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • January 3, 2019
    ...as: 2019 SKCA 2 Docket Number: CACV 3274 , CA19001 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-01-03 Judges: Jackson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Appeal ��Leave to Appeal Statutes � Interpretation � Court of Appeal Act, 2000, Section 8(2) Administrative Law � Apprehension of Bias � Recusal Digest: The......
  • Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...a reasonable apprehension of bias merely by filing a complaint with the Canadian Judicial Council. ...”. Similarly, in Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2 at paras 34-35, Justice Jackson identified the critical question for a judge remaining seized of a A complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council ......
  • PATEL v. SASKATCHEWAN HEALTH AUTHORITY (formerly the Regina Qu’Appelle Regional Health Authority), 2020 SKQB 194
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 22, 2020
    ...carefully in light of the entire context. There are no shortcuts. [emphasis added by Court of Appeal] More recently in Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2, has reiterated these same statements of the applicable principles. [16] In R v R.D.S., [1997] 2 SCR 484, the reasons of L’Heureux‑Dubé J. and M......
  • Patel v Saskatchewan Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 31, 2021
    ...reasons for recusal, its decision to recuse itself is not subject to review in the context of this appeal (see: Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2 at para 15, 44 CPC (8th) 12). [102]     A finding of reasonable apprehension of bias taints the entire proceeding and voids any rul......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
  • Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...a reasonable apprehension of bias merely by filing a complaint with the Canadian Judicial Council. ...”. Similarly, in Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2 at paras 34-35, Justice Jackson identified the critical question for a judge remaining seized of a A complaint to the Canadian Judicial Council ......
  • PATEL v. SASKATCHEWAN HEALTH AUTHORITY (formerly the Regina Qu’Appelle Regional Health Authority), 2020 SKQB 194
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 22, 2020
    ...carefully in light of the entire context. There are no shortcuts. [emphasis added by Court of Appeal] More recently in Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2, has reiterated these same statements of the applicable principles. [16] In R v R.D.S., [1997] 2 SCR 484, the reasons of L’Heureux‑Dubé J. and M......
  • Patel v Saskatchewan Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 31, 2021
    ...reasons for recusal, its decision to recuse itself is not subject to review in the context of this appeal (see: Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2 at para 15, 44 CPC (8th) 12). [102]     A finding of reasonable apprehension of bias taints the entire proceeding and voids any rul......
  • JACKSON v. JACKSON,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...carefully in light of the entire context. There are no shortcuts. [emphasis added by Court of Appeal] More recently in Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2, has reiterated these same statements of the applicable principles. [25]            ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Ayers v Miller, 2019 SKCA 2
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • January 3, 2019
    ...as: 2019 SKCA 2 Docket Number: CACV 3274 , CA19001 Court: Court of Appeal Date: 2019-01-03 Judges: Jackson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Appeal ��Leave to Appeal Statutes � Interpretation � Court of Appeal Act, 2000, Section 8(2) Administrative Law � Apprehension of Bias � Recusal Digest: The......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT