A.B.C.D. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2025 FC 1296 |
| Docket Number | IMM-9052-24 |
| Date | 21 July 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 practice notes
-
Habibi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...22, citing Toure v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 237 at para 16). [27] In ABCD v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296, Justice Gascon also noted that costs have frequently been awarded where excessive delay was caused by immigration decision-makers in mandamus ......
-
Lozada Gomez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...“special reasons”. The threshold is high for establishing that “special reasons” exist (A.B.C.D. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 at para 87 [A.B.C.D.] ; Mamut v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 1593 at para 128; Ghaddar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigratio......
-
A.B. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...evidence previously admitted. [64] The Applicant also relies on, and I agree A.B.C.D. v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 is an example of legitimate expectations arising from a similar policy for Afghan nationals. Justice Gascon confirmed his applicant had “leg......
-
Naeemi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...in some cases where this high threshold has been met on the particular facts (see e.g., A.B.C.D. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 at para 89 and cases cited therein). Here, there has no conduct or undue delay in the Court’s proceedings that could have justified an award ......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
Lozada Gomez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...“special reasons”. The threshold is high for establishing that “special reasons” exist (A.B.C.D. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 at para 87 [A.B.C.D.] ; Mamut v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 1593 at para 128; Ghaddar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigratio......
-
A.B. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...evidence previously admitted. [64] The Applicant also relies on, and I agree A.B.C.D. v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 is an example of legitimate expectations arising from a similar policy for Afghan nationals. Justice Gascon confirmed his applicant had “leg......
-
Naeemi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...in some cases where this high threshold has been met on the particular facts (see e.g., A.B.C.D. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 at para 89 and cases cited therein). Here, there has no conduct or undue delay in the Court’s proceedings that could have justified an award ......
-
A.A. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...no fault of IRCC either. There is no authority for this line of argument; the decision in A.B.C.D. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 has no application because there is nothing to suggest the operational context before Gascon J is comparable to that [50] Moreover, as the ......
Get Started for Free
