British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] N.R. TBEd. NO.010
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ. |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Date | 09 November 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
201 practice notes
-
Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 458 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
...411, refd to. [para. 566]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al. (2012), 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. 566, footnote Dunmore et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016; 279 N.R. 201; 154 O.A.C. 201; 207 D.L......
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
Ward v. Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse),
...de l’Hôpital général de Montréal, 2007 SCC 4, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 161; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v. British Columbia (Council of Human Rights), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 868; Queb......
Request a trial to view additional results
117 cases
-
Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 458 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
...411, refd to. [para. 566]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al. (2012), 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. 566, footnote Dunmore et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016; 279 N.R. 201; 154 O.A.C. 201; 207 D.L......
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
Ward v. Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse),
...de l’Hôpital général de Montréal, 2007 SCC 4, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 161; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v. British Columbia (Council of Human Rights), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 868; Queb......
Request a trial to view additional results
42 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (May 22, 2023 ' May 26, 2023)
...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155, Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, 2013 ONCA 396, Québec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Bombardier Inc.......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (July 2013)
...that the term "nexus" did not appear in the statements of the test for discrimination found in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, 351 D.L.R. (4th) 451 or in the Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155, 289 O.A.C 163, Juriansz J.A. held that it is preferable to use the words "connecti......
-
Recent Developments in Family Status Accommodation: A Three-Headed Monster of Approaches?
...the traditional three-part test for discrimination set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 (CanLII). We also note that there exists a third line of case law which was recently espoused by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Envirocon ......
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...that the Moore test for prima facie discrimination, as set down by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ("Moore"), is the appropriate test for determining family status discrimination cases in In our previous post on the issue of family status di......
Request a trial to view additional results
40 books & journal articles
-
Introduction
...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
-
Intervenors and Class Proceedings - Not Welcome at the Party?
...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
-
Table of Cases
...CanLII 18945 ...................................................................................117 Moore v British Columbia (Education) , 2012 SCC 61 ......................................................... 1074 , 1121 Morgan v Fry, [1968] 2 QB 710 (CA) .........................................
-
Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
Request a trial to view additional results