British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] N.R. TBEd. NO.010

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ.
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date09 November 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
201 practice notes
  • Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 458 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 30, 2014
    ...411, refd to. [para. 566]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al. (2012), 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. 566, footnote Dunmore et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016; 279 N.R. 201; 154 O.A.C. 201; 207 D.L......
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 21, 2015
    ...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 21, 2015
    ...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
  • Ward v. Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 29, 2021
    ...de l’Hôpital général de Montréal, 2007 SCC 4, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 161; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v. British Columbia (Council of Human Rights), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 868; Queb......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
117 cases
  • Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (2014) 458 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 30, 2014
    ...411, refd to. [para. 566]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al. (2012), 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. 566, footnote Dunmore et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016; 279 N.R. 201; 154 O.A.C. 201; 207 D.L......
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 21, 2015
    ...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
  • R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 21, 2015
    ...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
  • Ward v. Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 29, 2021
    ...de l’Hôpital général de Montréal, 2007 SCC 4, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 161; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v. British Columbia (Council of Human Rights), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 868; Queb......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
42 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (May 22, 2023 ' May 26, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 7, 2023
    ...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155, Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, 2013 ONCA 396, Québec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Bombardier Inc.......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (July 2013)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 23, 2013
    ...that the term "nexus" did not appear in the statements of the test for discrimination found in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, 351 D.L.R. (4th) 451 or in the Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155, 289 O.A.C 163, Juriansz J.A. held that it is preferable to use the words "connecti......
  • Recent Developments in Family Status Accommodation: A Three-Headed Monster of Approaches?
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • June 5, 2019
    ...the traditional three-part test for discrimination set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 (CanLII). We also note that there exists a third line of case law which was recently espoused by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Envirocon ......
  • Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 15, 2021
    ...that the Moore test for prima facie discrimination, as set down by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ("Moore"), is the appropriate test for determining family status discrimination cases in In our previous post on the issue of family status di......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
40 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
  • Intervenors and Class Proceedings - Not Welcome at the Party?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Labour and Employment Law. Cases, Materials, and Commentary. Ninth Edition
    • June 24, 2018
    ...CanLII 18945 ...................................................................................117 Moore v British Columbia (Education) , 2012 SCC 61 ......................................................... 1074 , 1121 Morgan v Fry, [1968] 2 QB 710 (CA) .........................................
  • Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 12-1, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT