British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ. |
| Citation | [2012] N.R. TBEd. NO.010,2012 SCC 61 |
| Date | 09 November 2012 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
237 practice notes
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Directrice de la protection de la jeunesse du CISSS A
...Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Canada (Transportation Safety Board) v. Carroll-Byrne, 2022 SCC ......
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
R. v. Kirkpatrick
...ABCA 219, 309 C.C.C. (3d) 163; 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v. Cunningham, 2011 SCC 37, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 670; R. v. D.A.I., 2......
Get Started for Free
152 cases
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 332 O.A.C. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Directrice de la protection de la jeunesse du CISSS A
...Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; Canada (Transportation Safety Board) v. Carroll-Byrne, 2022 SCC ......
-
R. v. Kokopenace (C.), (2015) 471 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...[para. 253]. British Columbia (Minister of Education) v. Moore et al., [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; 436 N.R. 152; 328 B.C.A.C. 1; 558 W.A.C. 1; 2012 SCC 61, refd to. [para. R. v. W.E.B., [2014] N.R. Uned. 2; [2014] 1 S.C.R. 34; 2014 SCC 2, refd to. [para. 262]. R. v. Clark (D.M.), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6......
-
R. v. Kirkpatrick
...ABCA 219, 309 C.C.C. (3d) 163; 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22; Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 360; Alberta (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development) v. Cunningham, 2011 SCC 37, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 670; R. v. D.A.I., 2......
Get Started for Free
45 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (May 22, 2023 ' May 26, 2023)
...(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155, Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, 2013 ONCA 396, Québec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Bombardier Inc.......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (July 2013)
...that the term "nexus" did not appear in the statements of the test for discrimination found in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61, 351 D.L.R. (4th) 451 or in the Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155, 289 O.A.C 163, Juriansz J.A. held that it is preferable to use the words "connecti......
-
Clarity From Confusion: Court Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...test for prima facie discrimination in general, described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ("Moore"). The Court thus definitively disapproved of the more-onerous test articulated by the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada (Attorney General) v......
-
Alberta Court Of Appeal Confirms Test For Family Status Discrimination
...that the Moore test for prima facie discrimination, as set down by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v. British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ("Moore"), is the appropriate test for determining family status discrimination cases in In our previous post on the issue of family status di......
Get Started for Free
43 books & journal articles
-
Class Actions as a Bridge Between Cultures of Dignity and Victimhood
...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
-
Introduction
...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
-
Table of cases
...3 SCR 141, 258 DLR (4th) 595, 2005 SCC 62 .....................................46, 51, 199, 202, 216 Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61 ....................................... 163 Morgentaler v New Brunswick, 2009 NBCA 26 ................................................ 306 M......
-
Successful Tobacco Litigation in Quebec: Why Hold Cigarettes to a Higher Standard Than Pharmaceutical Products?
...of individuals addicted to heroin. 59 Eaton v Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Moore v British Columbia (Education), 2012 SCC 61. 60 R v DAI, 2012 SCC 5, allowing a witness with a mental disability to testify in a sexual assault trial. See also Health Care (Consent) and Ca......
Get Started for Free