B.N.M. v. P.J.M., 2017 SKQB 331
Judge | MCINTYRE J |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Case Date | November 02, 2017 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | 2017 SKQB 331 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 practice notes
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...2240. 66 Shaw v Shaw, [2002] OJ No 2782 (SCJ). 67 Gartman v Hancherof, 2015 BCSC 160. 68 Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB 207; BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331. 69 Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB 207. D etermination of Income; Disclosure of Income 123 deducted in determining a parent’s Guidelines income. ......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...2014 BCSC 2240. Shaw v Shaw, [2002] OJ No 2782 (SCJ). Gartman v Hancheroff, 2015 BCSC 160. Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB 207; BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331. Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331. 126 Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 Several cases have declined to impute in......
-
Special or extraordinary expenses
...in order to be allowable. 25 21 Carroll v Richardson, 2014 NSSC 293. 22 LKS v DMCT, 2008 NSCA 61. 23 2013 MBCA 106; see also BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331 (cellphone expenses are not s 7 expenses). 24 See Andries v Andries (1998), 159 DLR (4th) 665 at para 11, Twaddle JA. 25 See also Bodine-Shah......
-
Special or Extraordinary Expenses
...v DMCT, 2008 NSCA 61. 2013 MBCA 106; see also FJN v JK, 2019 ABCA 305, leave to appeal to SCC denied 2020 CanLII 8218 (SCC); BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331 (cellphone expenses are not s 7 Special or Extraordinary Expenses 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 271 The table amount of child sup......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
TYACKE v TYACKE, 2019 SKQB 271
...exercise of quantifying every possible loss, or corresponding gain, that took place in the course of the relationship: B.N.M. v P.J.M., 2017 SKQB 331 at paras 177 and 178. Rather, the focus is a consideration of how the relationship impacted the standing of each of the spouses’ present and ......
-
RAPP v. BAUMANN, 2018 SKQB 134
...cohabitation and any other relevant factors. [230] Justice McIntyre recently set out the approach to spousal support in B.N.M v P.J.M., 2017 SKQB 331 177 Determining entitlement to spousal support is not an accounting exercise such as occurs in the division of family property. It involves t......
-
A.C.G. v. W.L.G., 2020 SKQB 43
...the proposed valuations for these assets other than the parties’ opinions. Justice McIntyre criticized this practice in B.N.M. v P.J.M., 2017 SKQB 331 and commented: [47] Fair market value of personal property including household goods is what they could be sold for on the market in a trans......
-
KORMOS v. KORMOS, 2018 SKQB 195
...cohabitation and any other relevant factors. [194] Justice McIntyre recently set out the approach to spousal support in B.N.M v P.J.M., 2017 SKQB 331: 177 Determining entitlement to spousal support is not an accounting exercise such as occurs in the division of family property. It involves ......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...2240. 66 Shaw v Shaw, [2002] OJ No 2782 (SCJ). 67 Gartman v Hancherof, 2015 BCSC 160. 68 Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB 207; BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331. 69 Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB 207. D etermination of Income; Disclosure of Income 123 deducted in determining a parent’s Guidelines income. ......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...2014 BCSC 2240. Shaw v Shaw, [2002] OJ No 2782 (SCJ). Gartman v Hancheroff, 2015 BCSC 160. Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB 207; BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331. Chopek v McKenzie, 2015 MBQB BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331. 126 Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 Several cases have declined to impute in......
-
Special or extraordinary expenses
...in order to be allowable. 25 21 Carroll v Richardson, 2014 NSSC 293. 22 LKS v DMCT, 2008 NSCA 61. 23 2013 MBCA 106; see also BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331 (cellphone expenses are not s 7 expenses). 24 See Andries v Andries (1998), 159 DLR (4th) 665 at para 11, Twaddle JA. 25 See also Bodine-Shah......
-
Special or Extraordinary Expenses
...v DMCT, 2008 NSCA 61. 2013 MBCA 106; see also FJN v JK, 2019 ABCA 305, leave to appeal to SCC denied 2020 CanLII 8218 (SCC); BNM v PJM, 2017 SKQB 331 (cellphone expenses are not s 7 Special or Extraordinary Expenses 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 271 The table amount of child sup......
Request a trial to view additional results