A.B.W. v. J.A.W.
| Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
| Court | Court of King's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
| Judge | Delaquis, Danys R.X. |
| Citation | 2025 NBKB 155 |
| Docket Number | FDSJ-374-2023 |
| Date | 30 June 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 practice notes
-
Ferguson v. Robichaud
...is a 50% shareholder and an officer. It is therefore not the same situation. In my view, it is instead the reasoning in A.B.W. v. J.A.W., 2025 NBKB 155, that applies here. In that case, the gentleman was a 51% shareholder and an officer. My colleague Delaquis, J. cites, at paragraph 38, the......
2 cases
-
M.H.C. v. S.A.C.G.
...as a matter of law under the Guidelines and the applicable Rules of Court. See also: Sutton v. Kay, 2002 NBCA 33; A.B.W. v. J.A.W., 2025 NBKB 155; and C.F. v. F.H., 2023 NBKB [31] It is possible that the father did not have certain......
-
Ferguson v. Robichaud
...is a 50% shareholder and an officer. It is therefore not the same situation. In my view, it is instead the reasoning in A.B.W. v. J.A.W., 2025 NBKB 155, that applies here. In that case, the gentleman was a 51% shareholder and an officer. My colleague Delaquis, J. cites, at paragraph 38, the......
