Babjak v. Karas,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | SANFILIPPO J. |
| Date | 29 March 2018 |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 2093 |
| Docket Number | CV-14-514261 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
McNeil v. Panchapakesan, 2019 ONSC 5816
...[60] In a summary judgment motion, each party must “put their best foot forward” and “lead trump or risk losing all”: Babjak v. Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, at para. 10; Lawless v. Anderson, 2010 ONSC 2723, at para. 17, aff’d 2011 ONCA 102; Loy-English v. Fournier, 2018 ONSC 6212, at para. 22; Sl......
-
Raun v Shumborski, 2019 ABQB 823
...and other situations where such an opinion is not necessary... [29] This latter view is echoed in the Ontario case Babjak v Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, relied on by Dr. Shumborski’s counsel, at para In some cases, an expert medical opinion is necessary for the plaintiff to discover the material ......
-
MacNeil v. Master Corporal Brow, 2018 ONSC 5760
...prevent injustice by “depriving a plaintiff of the opportunity to bring an action before that party knows to raise it”; Babjak v. Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, [2018] O.J. No. 1673 at para. 45, citing Central & Eastern Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147 at p. 224; Nielsen v. Kamloops, [1......
-
Salmon v Mama Panda Ltd, 2021 ABQB 569
...had read and understood the documents sufficiently that counsel related the substance of the records to an expert. In Babjak v Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, the fact that the plaintiff had a vison problem since the procedure was sufficient to make out discoverability, so although she did not have ......
4 cases
-
McNeil v. Panchapakesan, 2019 ONSC 5816
...[60] In a summary judgment motion, each party must “put their best foot forward” and “lead trump or risk losing all”: Babjak v. Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, at para. 10; Lawless v. Anderson, 2010 ONSC 2723, at para. 17, aff’d 2011 ONCA 102; Loy-English v. Fournier, 2018 ONSC 6212, at para. 22; Sl......
-
Raun v Shumborski, 2019 ABQB 823
...and other situations where such an opinion is not necessary... [29] This latter view is echoed in the Ontario case Babjak v Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, relied on by Dr. Shumborski’s counsel, at para In some cases, an expert medical opinion is necessary for the plaintiff to discover the material ......
-
MacNeil v. Master Corporal Brow, 2018 ONSC 5760
...prevent injustice by “depriving a plaintiff of the opportunity to bring an action before that party knows to raise it”; Babjak v. Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, [2018] O.J. No. 1673 at para. 45, citing Central & Eastern Trust Co. v. Rafuse, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147 at p. 224; Nielsen v. Kamloops, [1......
-
Salmon v Mama Panda Ltd, 2021 ABQB 569
...had read and understood the documents sufficiently that counsel related the substance of the records to an expert. In Babjak v Karas, 2018 ONSC 2093, the fact that the plaintiff had a vison problem since the procedure was sufficient to make out discoverability, so although she did not have ......