Balanyk v. Dutton Brock LLP

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeGillese, Rouleau and Tulloch, JJ.A.
Date14 February 2014
Citation2014 ONCA 122,[2014] O.A.C. Uned. 83 (CA),[2014] O.A.C. Uned. 83
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 26 ' 30, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 6 Julio 2023
    ...Jurisdiction, Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 140, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 2.1.01, Balanyk v. Dutton Brock LLP, 2014 ONCA 122, Lukezic v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2012 ONCA 350, Foy v. Foy (No. 2) (1979), 26 O.R. (2d) 220 (C.A.), 102 D.L.R. (3d) 342n, Kallaba v. Bylykbas......
  • Obtaining A Vexatious Litigant Order ' The Process Matters
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 4 Abril 2024
    ...determine a litigant vexatious must be initiated by any interested person bringing an application (also see Balanyk v. Dutton Brock LLP, 2014 ONCA 122). 140 (1) Where a judge of the Superior Court of Justice is satisfied, on application, that a person has persistently and without reasonable......
  • Szot v. Cozzi
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 21 Enero 2025
    ...is a matter for the legislature and for the courts given the broad wording of the current section”: Balanyk v. Dutton Brock LLP, 2014 ONCA 122 at para. 2. I find that there is no impediment to Mr. Szot bringing this application, and that he has standing to do so. Governing law and analysis ......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 26 ' 30, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 6 Julio 2023
    ...Jurisdiction, Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 140, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 2.1.01, Balanyk v. Dutton Brock LLP, 2014 ONCA 122, Lukezic v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2012 ONCA 350, Foy v. Foy (No. 2) (1979), 26 O.R. (2d) 220 (C.A.), 102 D.L.R. (3d) 342n, Kallaba v. Bylykbas......
  • Obtaining A Vexatious Litigant Order ' The Process Matters
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 4 Abril 2024
    ...determine a litigant vexatious must be initiated by any interested person bringing an application (also see Balanyk v. Dutton Brock LLP, 2014 ONCA 122). 140 (1) Where a judge of the Superior Court of Justice is satisfied, on application, that a person has persistently and without reasonable......