BANILEVIC v. CAIRNEY, 2020 SKQB 25
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | MEGAW J. |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 25 |
| Docket Number | DIV 66 of 2016 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 27 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...307 Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25.......................................................................................................... 599, 619, Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 Baram v Bakshy, [2000] OJ No 2349 (SCJ)...............................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...Embree v Embree, 2016 NBCA 42 (spousal support); Smart v Smart, 2014 ONSC 4464. 122 2018 NUCJ 10 at para 23. See also Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 at para Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 2. 3. 4. the prejudice caused by granting or denying the adjournment; the applicant’s expl......
-
Anderson v Anderson,
...Two recent Queen’s Bench decisions – C.M. v S.K., 2017 SKQB 289 [C.M.], and Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 [Banilevic] – adopted and applied a more principled approach to the exercise of judicial discretion under s. 40 by invoking the analytical framework establ......
-
McCORMACK v. PILLER,
...This litany of factors has been endorsed in Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25. To similar effect in other jurisdictions see, for example: Navarro v Doig River First Nation, 2015 BCSC 2173 at para 20, 84 CPC (7th) 163, and Ariston Realty Corp. v Elcarim Inc. (2007), 51 CPC (6th) 326 (CanLII)......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Anderson v Anderson,
...Two recent Queen’s Bench decisions – C.M. v S.K., 2017 SKQB 289 [C.M.], and Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 [Banilevic] – adopted and applied a more principled approach to the exercise of judicial discretion under s. 40 by invoking the analytical framework establ......
-
McCORMACK v. PILLER,
...This litany of factors has been endorsed in Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25. To similar effect in other jurisdictions see, for example: Navarro v Doig River First Nation, 2015 BCSC 2173 at para 20, 84 CPC (7th) 163, and Ariston Realty Corp. v Elcarim Inc. (2007), 51 CPC (6th) 326 (CanLII)......
-
Fraser v Ksenych,
...legal advice, and not go as far as guiding the presentation of a self-represented party’s case: also see Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 at paras 19–29. [26] Lastly, the Canadian Judicial Council has set out gu......
-
Banilevic v Cairney,
...(iii) Mr. Banilevic had failed to establish the exemptions from divisibility that he claimed over certain property: Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 [ Decision]. Despite reaching those conclusions, the trial judge determined that the parties had not led sufficient evidence concerning the i......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...307 Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25.......................................................................................................... 599, 619, Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 Baram v Bakshy, [2000] OJ No 2349 (SCJ)...............................................................
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...Embree v Embree, 2016 NBCA 42 (spousal support); Smart v Smart, 2014 ONSC 4464. 122 2018 NUCJ 10 at para 23. See also Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 at para Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 2. 3. 4. the prejudice caused by granting or denying the adjournment; the applicant’s expl......