Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2019 SCC 13
Docket Number37594
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date22 February 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani‑Utenam), 2020 SCC 4
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • February 21, 2020
    ...(Iron Ore Company of Canada), 2014 QCCS 4403; Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077; Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13; Hunt v. T&N plc, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 289; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Pembina Exploration Canada Ltd., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 206; Lac d’Amiante ......
  • British Columbia v. The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 4, 2021
    ...also raise a second ground of prejudice. Relying on the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgment in Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13, they argue that the Order requires them to participate in the certification hearing (and perhaps in other pre-certification motions brought by othe......
  • Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 17, 2022
    ...More recently, in Barer v Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13, [2019] 1 SCR 573 [Barer], Brown J., concurring in the result, described the genesis of the Van Breda common law rules and stated that the framework was largely inspired by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada’s Uniform Court......
  • Nexen Energy ULC v ITP SA, 2020 ABQB 83
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 4, 2020
    ...This will be the case where a “substantial connection between the dispute and the forum” is found to exist: Barer v Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13 at para 85. The constitutional purpose of the jurisdiction simpliciter test is to establish a minimum threshold for the assumption of jurisdic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani‑Utenam), 2020 SCC 4
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • February 21, 2020
    ...(Iron Ore Company of Canada), 2014 QCCS 4403; Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077; Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13; Hunt v. T&N plc, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 289; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Pembina Exploration Canada Ltd., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 206; Lac d’Amiante ......
  • British Columbia v. The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 4, 2021
    ...also raise a second ground of prejudice. Relying on the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgment in Barer v. Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13, they argue that the Order requires them to participate in the certification hearing (and perhaps in other pre-certification motions brought by othe......
  • Saskatchewan Power Corporation v Mitsubishi Power Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 17, 2022
    ...More recently, in Barer v Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13, [2019] 1 SCR 573 [Barer], Brown J., concurring in the result, described the genesis of the Van Breda common law rules and stated that the framework was largely inspired by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada’s Uniform Court......
  • Nexen Energy ULC v ITP SA, 2020 ABQB 83
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 4, 2020
    ...This will be the case where a “substantial connection between the dispute and the forum” is found to exist: Barer v Knight Brothers LLC, 2019 SCC 13 at para 85. The constitutional purpose of the jurisdiction simpliciter test is to establish a minimum threshold for the assumption of jurisdic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT