Bauer Hockey Ltd v. Sport Maska Inc., 2020 FC 212
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 212 |
| Date | 06 February 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2023 FC 1149
...and avoid surprise at trial (see, e.g., Canada v Lehigh Cement Limited, 2011 FCA 120 at para 30; Bauer Hockey Ltd v Sport Maska Inc, 2020 FC 212 at para [32] The current patent litigation process prescribed by the Regulations takes place by action. This is one of the aspects of the current ......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690
...Janssen Inc v Teva Canada Limited [Janssen], 2019 FC 1309 at para 16, as well as earlier this year, in Bauer Hockey LTD v Sport Maska Inc, 2020 FC 212 at para 15 [Bauer], where Justice Grammond also noted the distinction between a responding report being challenged, and a reply report, at p......
-
Angelcare Development Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., 2020 FC 1185
...Fothergrill in Swist v Meg Energy Corp, 2020 FC 759 [Swist] at paragraph 9, by Justice Grammond in Bauer Hockey Ltd. v Sport Maska Inc., 2020 FC 212 [Bauer] at paragraph 15 and by Justice Manson in Janssen Inc. v Teva Canada Limited, 2019 FC 1309 [Janssen] at paragraph 16. In Janssen, Justi......
-
Swist v. Meg Energy Corp, 2020 FC 759
...Pharma Inc v Apotex Inc, 2007 FC 913 at paras 9-12). [12] As Justice Sébastien Grammond observed in Bauer Hockey Ltd v Sport Maska Inc, 2020 FC 212 [Bauer] at para 16: Before applying those principles to the situation at hand, I would simply add that parties should not bring this kind of mo......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd. v. Sandoz Canada Inc., 2023 FC 1149
...and avoid surprise at trial (see, e.g., Canada v Lehigh Cement Limited, 2011 FCA 120 at para 30; Bauer Hockey Ltd v Sport Maska Inc, 2020 FC 212 at para [32] The current patent litigation process prescribed by the Regulations takes place by action. This is one of the aspects of the current ......
-
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Canada, 2020 FC 690
...Janssen Inc v Teva Canada Limited [Janssen], 2019 FC 1309 at para 16, as well as earlier this year, in Bauer Hockey LTD v Sport Maska Inc, 2020 FC 212 at para 15 [Bauer], where Justice Grammond also noted the distinction between a responding report being challenged, and a reply report, at p......
-
Angelcare Development Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., 2020 FC 1185
...Fothergrill in Swist v Meg Energy Corp, 2020 FC 759 [Swist] at paragraph 9, by Justice Grammond in Bauer Hockey Ltd. v Sport Maska Inc., 2020 FC 212 [Bauer] at paragraph 15 and by Justice Manson in Janssen Inc. v Teva Canada Limited, 2019 FC 1309 [Janssen] at paragraph 16. In Janssen, Justi......
-
Swist v. Meg Energy Corp, 2020 FC 759
...Pharma Inc v Apotex Inc, 2007 FC 913 at paras 9-12). [12] As Justice Sébastien Grammond observed in Bauer Hockey Ltd v Sport Maska Inc, 2020 FC 212 [Bauer] at para 16: Before applying those principles to the situation at hand, I would simply add that parties should not bring this kind of mo......
Request a trial to view additional results