Becker v. Walgate
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Huscroft, Grant; George, Jonathon C.; Favreau, Lise G. |
| Citation | 2025 ONCA 696 |
| Docket Number | M55802; COA-24-CV-0355 |
| Date | 15 October 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 9 ' February 13, 2026)
...Barylak v. Figol (1995), 9 E.T.R. (2d) 305 (Ont. C.J. Gen. Div.), Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, 2003 SCC 63, Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, Aba-Alkhail v. University of Ottawa, 2013 ONCA 633, Winter v. Sherman Estate, 2018 ONCA 703, Ontario v. Lipsitz, 2011 ONCA 466, Abarca v. Va......
-
Elizabeth Casey Cooke Family Trust v. Dioguardi
...attack doctrine is a subset operating within the broader doctrine of abuse of process: C.U.P.E., at para. 22; Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, at para. 31. The motion judge’s reasoning shows that he was properly applying this broader abuse of process doctrine to prevent the appellants from......
-
Jones-Moore v. Moore
...that have already been decided … [and] can also apply to issues that could have been determined in prior proceedings”: Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, at para. 34; see also: Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, 2003 SCC 63, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77, at para. 37; Aba-Aikhail v. University of Ot......
-
Huismans v. Huismans
...205 (Ont. Gen. Div.) are not applicable. [68] Peter relies on the case of Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, which states in paragraph 41 that “[i]nterpreting a court order requires attention to the text of the order, the reasons for decision, t......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Elizabeth Casey Cooke Family Trust v. Dioguardi
...attack doctrine is a subset operating within the broader doctrine of abuse of process: C.U.P.E., at para. 22; Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, at para. 31. The motion judge’s reasoning shows that he was properly applying this broader abuse of process doctrine to prevent the appellants from......
-
Jones-Moore v. Moore
...that have already been decided … [and] can also apply to issues that could have been determined in prior proceedings”: Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, at para. 34; see also: Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, 2003 SCC 63, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77, at para. 37; Aba-Aikhail v. University of Ot......
-
Huismans v. Huismans
...205 (Ont. Gen. Div.) are not applicable. [68] Peter relies on the case of Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, which states in paragraph 41 that “[i]nterpreting a court order requires attention to the text of the order, the reasons for decision, t......
-
Lahey v. Lahey
...would be manifestly unfair to a party or would in some way bring the administration of justice into disrepute (see: Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696 at para. [76] An implicit attack on the correctness of the factual basis of a decision is a “collateral attack” and an......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 9 ' February 13, 2026)
...Barylak v. Figol (1995), 9 E.T.R. (2d) 305 (Ont. C.J. Gen. Div.), Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, 2003 SCC 63, Becker v. Walgate, 2025 ONCA 696, Aba-Alkhail v. University of Ottawa, 2013 ONCA 633, Winter v. Sherman Estate, 2018 ONCA 703, Ontario v. Lipsitz, 2011 ONCA 466, Abarca v. Va......
