Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co., 2000 MBCA 81
Judge | Scott, C.J.M., Twaddle and Steel, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Case Date | June 12, 2000 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | 2000 MBCA 81;(2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105 (CA) |
Best v. Revere Life (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105 (CA);
230 W.A.C. 105
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2000] Man.R.(2d) TBEd. SE.019
Candace Best (plaintiff/appellant) v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (defendant/respondent)
(AI 00-30-04546; 2000 MBCA 81)
Indexed As: Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co.
Manitoba Court of Appeal
Scott, C.J.M., Twaddle and Steel, JJ.A.
September 8, 2000.
Summary:
The plaintiff sued the defendant insurance company for the payment of disability benefits as a result of her inability to perform the regular duties of her occupation. The defendant moved for an order to compel the plaintiff to attend for an ergonomic practice assessment. A Master dismissed the motion. The defendant appealed.
The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, in a decision reported at 144 Man.R.(2d) 145, allowed the appeal. The plaintiff appealed.
The Manitoba Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.
Courts - Topic 2004
Jurisdiction - Inherent jurisdiction - [See Practice - Topic 4786.1 ].
Practice - Topic 4776
Discovery - Physical or psychological examination - General - At issue between the parties was the extent of the plaintiff's functional limitation in working as a dental hygienist - The defendant sought an order to compel the plaintiff to attend for an ergonomic practice assessment by Dr. Rucker - Dr. Rucker was a licensed dentist and had been involved in the area of dental ergonomics since 1981 - The Manitoba Court of Appeal stated that in order to come within Queen's Bench Rule 33 (motions for physical or mental examinations) the health care practitioner had to conduct an examination within the area in which he or she was licensed to practice - While Dr. Rucker was a licensed dentist, he did not intend to conduct a dental examination of the plaintiff - Therefore, the order sought, if it was to be made, could only be made pursuant to the court's inherent jurisdiction - See paragraphs 14 to 15.
Practice - Topic 4776
Discovery - Physical or psychological examination - General - [See Practice - Topic 4786.1 ].
Practice - Topic 4779
Discovery - Physical or psychological examination - Circumstances justifying refusal - [See Practice - Topic 4786.1 ].
Practice - Topic 4786.1
Discovery - Physical or psychological examination - Ergonomic assessment - At issue between the parties was the extent of the plaintiff's functional limitation in working as a dental hygienist - The defendant sought an order to compel the plaintiff to attend for an ergonomic practice assessment by Dr. Rucker, a licensed dentist who had been involved in the area of dental ergonomics since 1981 - A motions judge granted the order - The plaintiff appealed - The Manitoba Court of Appeal allowed the appeal - The court held that while it had inherent jurisdiction to order an examination by an expert other than a health care practitioner as specified in the Court of Queen's Bench Act, that jurisdiction was to be exercised only where the principles of justice and fairness dictated and only in a clear case and the onus was on the defendant to satisfy those criteria - In this case, the proposed examination was not necessary to rebut any of the other expert examinations and the lack of an assessment would not prejudice the defendant - Further, requiring the plaintiff to undergo an examination in a relatively new scientific area required special scrutiny of the nature of the assessment and that kind of evidence was not presented.
Cases Noticed:
Gilroy v. Cooperators General Insurance Co. (1994), 117 Sask.R. 269; 21 C.P.C.(3d) 337 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 16].
Halstead v. Anderson et al. (1993), 115 Sask.R. 257 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].
McCuaig v. Halverson, [1993] S.J. No. 477 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].
Jobes v. Zolinski et al. (1999), 134 Man.R.(2d) 302; 193 W.A.C. 302 (C.A.), dist. [para. 21].
Jaworski v. Wilkinson et al. (1966), 58 W.W.R.(N.S.) 211 (Man. Q.B.), dist. [para. 27].
R. v. Mohan, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9; 166 N.R. 245; 71 O.A.C. 241; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 402; 29 C.R.(4th) 243; 114 D.L.R.(4th) 419, refd to. [para. 34].
Green v. Lawrence et al. (1997), 119 Man.R.(2d) 3 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 36].
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. (1993), 113 S.Ct. 2786, refd to. [para. 37].
Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999), 119A S.Ct. 1167, refd to. [para. 37].
Tower Estates Ltd. v. Canadian General Insurance Co. (1989), 62 Man.R.(2d) 159 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].
Statutes Noticed:
Court of Queen's Bench Act, S.M. 1988-89, c. 4; C.C.S.M., c. C-280, sect. 63 [Appendix].
Rules of Court (Man.), Queen's Bench Rules, rule 33.01 [Appendix].
Counsel:
K.N. Stern, for the appellant;
R.E. Stephenson, Q.C., for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on June 12, 2000, before Scott, C.J.M., and Twaddle and Steel, JJ.A., of the Manitoba Court of Appeal. The following judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Steel, J.A., on September 8, 2000.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Pearce (M.L.),
...69]. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), 509 U.S. 579, refd to. [para. 69]. Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co. (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105; 230 W.A.C. 105; 2000 MBCA 81, refd to. [para. 69]. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999), 526 U.S. 137, refd to. [para. 70]. R. v. McInto......
-
Table of cases
...16 Becamon v Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2009 ONCA 113 ............. 190 Best v Paul Revere Life Insurance Co, 2000 MBCA 81 ...................................... 267 BL v Saskatchewan (Ministry of Social Services), 2012 SKCA 38 ........................17 Blank v Canada (Justice), 20......
-
Opinion and Expert Evidence
...para 133. 190 J(J-L) , above note 78. 191 Wolfin v Shaw (1998), 43 BCLR (3d) 190 (SC) at 196. 192 Best v Paul Revere Life Insurance Co , 2000 MBCA 81. 193 J(J-L) , above note 78. And see R v Aitken , 2012 BCCA 134 [ Aitken ]. 194 R v Dimitrov (2003), 68 OR (3d) 641 (CA) at para 40 [ Dimitro......
-
J.C.K. v. P.G.B., 2014 MBQB 247
...- Calculation or attribution of income - [See Family Law - Topic 2210 ]. Cases Noticed: Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co. (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105; 230 W.A.C. 105; 2000 MBCA 81, refd to. [para. Baillie v. Middleton, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3728; 2012 ONSC 3728, refd to. [para. 56]. Aut......
-
R. v. Pearce (M.L.),
...69]. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), 509 U.S. 579, refd to. [para. 69]. Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co. (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105; 230 W.A.C. 105; 2000 MBCA 81, refd to. [para. 69]. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999), 526 U.S. 137, refd to. [para. 70]. R. v. McInto......
-
J.C.K. v. P.G.B., 2014 MBQB 247
...- Calculation or attribution of income - [See Family Law - Topic 2210 ]. Cases Noticed: Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co. (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105; 230 W.A.C. 105; 2000 MBCA 81, refd to. [para. Baillie v. Middleton, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 3728; 2012 ONSC 3728, refd to. [para. 56]. Aut......
-
M.V. v. W.P.V. et al., 2003 MBQB 110
...27]. Anderson v. Walden, [1960] O.R. 50; 21 D.L.R.(2d) 279 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 35]. Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co. (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105; 230 W.A.C. 105 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Sopinka, John, Lederman, Sydney N., and Bryant, Alan, W., The Law of......
-
Nandwani v. Nandwani et al., (2013) 288 Man.R.(2d) 228 (CA)
...et al. (2006), 260 N.S.R.(2d) 72; 796 A.P.R. 72; 2006 NSCA 140, refd to. [para. 54]. Best v. Revere (Paul) Life Insurance Co. (2000), 150 Man.R.(2d) 105; 230 W.A.C. 105; 2000 MBCA 81, refd to. [para. 57]. J. v. N. (1976), 69 D.L.R.(3d) 347 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 65]. F.A.L. v. A.B.B. ......
-
Table of cases
...16 Becamon v Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, 2009 ONCA 113 ............. 190 Best v Paul Revere Life Insurance Co, 2000 MBCA 81 ...................................... 267 BL v Saskatchewan (Ministry of Social Services), 2012 SKCA 38 ........................17 Blank v Canada (Justice), 20......
-
Opinion and Expert Evidence
...para 133. 190 J(J-L) , above note 78. 191 Wolfin v Shaw (1998), 43 BCLR (3d) 190 (SC) at 196. 192 Best v Paul Revere Life Insurance Co , 2000 MBCA 81. 193 J(J-L) , above note 78. And see R v Aitken , 2012 BCCA 134 [ Aitken ]. 194 R v Dimitrov (2003), 68 OR (3d) 641 (CA) at para 40 [ Dimitro......