Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Jackson
Citation2020 BCSC 1065
Date20 July 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS20319
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Holt v. McLatchy,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 18, 2022
    ...639; Broomfield v. Lof, 2019 BCSC 1155; Hartman v. MMS Homes Ltd., 2021 BCSC 2165; Lo v. Daneshararan, 2020 BCSC 840; Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065; Pike v. Kasiri, 2016 BCSC 555; Lo v. Vos, 2019 BCSC 1306; Francello v. Cupskey, 2019 BCSC 1724; Hale v. Keyes, 2020 BCSC 559; De Fazio c. ......
  • C.D. v. Mostowy,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 1, 2021
    ...[2014] S.C.C.A. No. 101. A witness may be a sincere and genuine person, and still be an unreliable witness: Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065 at para. 39, citing Price v. Kostryba, [1982] B.C.J. No. 1518 at 1. As Justice Dixon observed in Hardychuk v. Johnstone, 2012 BCSC 1359: [10] &#......
  • Golkar-Karimabadi v. Bush,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...2017 BCSC 2068 (in particular in relation to the “golden years” principle:  see paras. 430-431); Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065; and Kelly v. Kalra, 2019 BCSC 1305. [71]        On behalf of the defendants, Mr. MacLennan submits that a......
  • Kalsey v. Byra,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...2018 BCSC 334 ($115,000), Tolea v. Huang, 2021 BCSC 260 ($150,000); Johnstone v. Rogic, 2018 BCSC 988 ($145,000); and Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065 [82]        The defendants say that in all of the above cases, the plaintiffs suffered more severe chron......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Holt v. McLatchy,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 18, 2022
    ...639; Broomfield v. Lof, 2019 BCSC 1155; Hartman v. MMS Homes Ltd., 2021 BCSC 2165; Lo v. Daneshararan, 2020 BCSC 840; Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065; Pike v. Kasiri, 2016 BCSC 555; Lo v. Vos, 2019 BCSC 1306; Francello v. Cupskey, 2019 BCSC 1724; Hale v. Keyes, 2020 BCSC 559; De Fazio c. ......
  • C.D. v. Mostowy,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 1, 2021
    ...[2014] S.C.C.A. No. 101. A witness may be a sincere and genuine person, and still be an unreliable witness: Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065 at para. 39, citing Price v. Kostryba, [1982] B.C.J. No. 1518 at 1. As Justice Dixon observed in Hardychuk v. Johnstone, 2012 BCSC 1359: [10] &#......
  • Golkar-Karimabadi v. Bush,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 26, 2021
    ...2017 BCSC 2068 (in particular in relation to the “golden years” principle:  see paras. 430-431); Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065; and Kelly v. Kalra, 2019 BCSC 1305. [71]        On behalf of the defendants, Mr. MacLennan submits that a......
  • Kalsey v. Byra,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...2018 BCSC 334 ($115,000), Tolea v. Huang, 2021 BCSC 260 ($150,000); Johnstone v. Rogic, 2018 BCSC 988 ($145,000); and Bidulka v. Haugen, 2020 BCSC 1065 [82]        The defendants say that in all of the above cases, the plaintiffs suffered more severe chron......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT