Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95

JudgeKendell
CourtCourt of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateMonday February 11, 2019
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2019 ABQB 95

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 practice notes
  • Simon v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ABQB 824
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 25, 2019
    ...16, citing Chutskoff Estate v Bonora, 2014 ABQB 389 at para 92, aff’d 2014 ABCA 444 (Chutskoff #1); Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 at para 47, leave to appeal refused (27 February 2019) [33] Following the first decision, the party who is facing possible prospective court ......
  • Vermillion Networks Inc v Vermilion Energy Inc, 2022 ABQB 287
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...dispute history – including litigation in other jurisdictions and non-judicial proceedings: Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 at para 48 [Biley]. Further, both the Judicature Act and this Court’s inherent jurisdiction allow it to extend “abusive litigant......
  • Irvine v Kristensen, 2019 ABQB 607
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 7, 2019
    ...Abuses of process have also been associated with vexatious processes: Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 at paras 123-5, and the cases cited therein. In Chutskoff v Bonora, 2014 ABQB 389, this Court reviewed an extensive array of vexatious litigation cases, identifying some o......
  • Biley v International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, its Territories and Canada, Local 210, 2019 ABQB 130
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 25, 2019
    ...any other timeline this Honourable Court may allow. [7] In a February 11, 2019, decision reported as Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 [Biley v Sherwood], Madam Justice Kendell struck out three lawsuits by Mr. Biley as abusive litigation, declared that Mr. Biley was a vexati......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • Simon v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ABQB 824
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 25, 2019
    ...16, citing Chutskoff Estate v Bonora, 2014 ABQB 389 at para 92, aff’d 2014 ABCA 444 (Chutskoff #1); Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 at para 47, leave to appeal refused (27 February 2019) [33] Following the first decision, the party who is facing possible prospective court ......
  • Vermillion Networks Inc v Vermilion Energy Inc, 2022 ABQB 287
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 20, 2022
    ...dispute history – including litigation in other jurisdictions and non-judicial proceedings: Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 at para 48 [Biley]. Further, both the Judicature Act and this Court’s inherent jurisdiction allow it to extend “abusive litigant......
  • Irvine v Kristensen, 2019 ABQB 607
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 7, 2019
    ...Abuses of process have also been associated with vexatious processes: Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 at paras 123-5, and the cases cited therein. In Chutskoff v Bonora, 2014 ABQB 389, this Court reviewed an extensive array of vexatious litigation cases, identifying some o......
  • Biley v International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, its Territories and Canada, Local 210, 2019 ABQB 130
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 25, 2019
    ...any other timeline this Honourable Court may allow. [7] In a February 11, 2019, decision reported as Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 [Biley v Sherwood], Madam Justice Kendell struck out three lawsuits by Mr. Biley as abusive litigation, declared that Mr. Biley was a vexati......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Alberta Court Closes The Door On Vexatious Class Action
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 11, 2019
    ...class, declared the plaintiff to be a vexatious litigant, and restricted his future access to the Court. In Biley v Sherwood Ford Limited, 2019 ABQB 95, the Court considered three separate actions by a self-represented plaintiff, including a $11 million proposed class action. Justice Kendel......