Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. et al. v. Greater Vancouver Water District et al., 2014 BCSC 1560

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeGriffin, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2014 BCSC 1560,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1560 (SC),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1560
Date18 August 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 Enero 2020
    ...of Aecon Construction Group Inc. v. Brampton (City), 2010 ONCA 898, Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. v. Greater Vancouver Water District, 2014 BCSC 1560, and Northwest Waste Solutions Inc. v. Super Save Disposal Inc., 2017 BCCA 312 for the proposition that agreements between parties that “cha......
  • No Limits Sportswear Inc. v. 0912139 B.C. Ltd. et al., 2015 BCCA 193
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 12 Marzo 2015
    ...refd to. [para. 36]. Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. et al. v. Greater Vancouver Water District et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1560; 2014 BCSC 1560, refd to. [para. Hodgkinson v. Simms (1988), 33 B.C.L.R.(2d) 129 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40]. Gichuru v. Information and Privacy Commissioner (B.......
  • Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG et al., 2015 BCSC 485
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 Marzo 2015
    ...and made it clear that they did not impugn the professional ethics of opposite counsel. I did not order special costs there (see 2014 BCSC 1560 at paras. 210-213) and I do not order it here. [175] The scale of this litigation and the amounts at stake for their respective clients must be tax......
  • 2024 BCSC 518,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2024
    ...and C21 with respect to the Platform or this litigation is relevant: Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. v. Greater Vancouver Water District, 2014 BCSC 1560. C21 has led no evidence to prove the addendum is protected by litigation privilege, such as the circumstances and purpose of the creation ......
  • Get Started for Free
11 cases
  • Taherkhani v. Este, 2020 BCSC 101
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 Enero 2020
    ...of Aecon Construction Group Inc. v. Brampton (City), 2010 ONCA 898, Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. v. Greater Vancouver Water District, 2014 BCSC 1560, and Northwest Waste Solutions Inc. v. Super Save Disposal Inc., 2017 BCCA 312 for the proposition that agreements between parties that “cha......
  • No Limits Sportswear Inc. v. 0912139 B.C. Ltd. et al., 2015 BCCA 193
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 12 Marzo 2015
    ...refd to. [para. 36]. Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. et al. v. Greater Vancouver Water District et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1560; 2014 BCSC 1560, refd to. [para. Hodgkinson v. Simms (1988), 33 B.C.L.R.(2d) 129 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40]. Gichuru v. Information and Privacy Commissioner (B.......
  • Greater Vancouver Water District v. Bilfinger Berger AG et al., 2015 BCSC 485
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 Marzo 2015
    ...and made it clear that they did not impugn the professional ethics of opposite counsel. I did not order special costs there (see 2014 BCSC 1560 at paras. 210-213) and I do not order it here. [175] The scale of this litigation and the amounts at stake for their respective clients must be tax......
  • 2024 BCSC 518,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2024
    ...and C21 with respect to the Platform or this litigation is relevant: Bilfinger Berger (Canada) Inc. v. Greater Vancouver Water District, 2014 BCSC 1560. C21 has led no evidence to prove the addendum is protected by litigation privilege, such as the circumstances and purpose of the creation ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT