Billimoria v. Mistry
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | J.M. WOOLLCOMBE J. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONSC 1939 |
| Citation | 2021 ONSC 1939 |
| Date | 24 March 2021 |
| Docket Number | CV-19-2765 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Billimoria v. Mistry
...On appeal from the judgment of Justice Jennifer Woollcombe of the Superior Court of Justice, dated March 24, 2021, with reasons at 2021 ONSC 1939. REASONS FOR DECISION OVERVIEW [1]           This appeal arises from a dispute between two owne......
-
Sun v Leung
...the fact that promissory estoppel is raised as defence does not mean that partition and sale should be refused. In Billimoria v. Mistry, 2021 ONSC 1939 the Court ordered partition and sale in spite of the fact that the party opposing the sale claimed promissory estoppel. In this case there ......
-
Vojvodic v Agostino et Al
...to calculate given the passage of time, since expenses were incurred and alleged services were provided. In Billimoria v. Mistry, 2021 ONSC 1939, Woolcombe J. dealt with a similar situation when assessing what amount of net sale proceeds each party should receive. At para. 148 she found tha......
3 cases
-
Billimoria v. Mistry
...On appeal from the judgment of Justice Jennifer Woollcombe of the Superior Court of Justice, dated March 24, 2021, with reasons at 2021 ONSC 1939. REASONS FOR DECISION OVERVIEW [1]           This appeal arises from a dispute between two owne......
-
Sun v Leung
...the fact that promissory estoppel is raised as defence does not mean that partition and sale should be refused. In Billimoria v. Mistry, 2021 ONSC 1939 the Court ordered partition and sale in spite of the fact that the party opposing the sale claimed promissory estoppel. In this case there ......
-
Vojvodic v Agostino et Al
...to calculate given the passage of time, since expenses were incurred and alleged services were provided. In Billimoria v. Mistry, 2021 ONSC 1939, Woolcombe J. dealt with a similar situation when assessing what amount of net sale proceeds each party should receive. At para. 148 she found tha......