Bank of Montreal v. Southcombe, [2012] A.R. Uned. 51
| Subject Matter | FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION,CONTRACTS,BANKS AND BANKING |
| Citation | [2012] A.R. Uned. 51,2012 ABQB 20,[2012] A.R. Uned. 51 (QBM) |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 10 January 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Oswald v. Start Up SRL,
...and the purchaser acted in concert with the realtor, the contract may be voidable: see, for example, Bank of Montreal v. Southcombe, 2012 ABQB 20. Likewise, it is a basic principle of contract law that where a party enters into a contract having been misled by fraudulent misrepresentation, ......
-
Bank of Montreal v. Landry, [2012] A.R. Uned. 823 (QBM)
...Mr. Donszelmann has been the subject of judicial comment for his involvement in various RV rental schemes: Bank of Montréal v. Southcombe 2012 ABQB 20. The Bank Montréal chose not to cross-examine the Landrys on their affidavits with the result that there is no clear evidence of the connect......
2 cases
-
Oswald v. Start Up SRL,
...and the purchaser acted in concert with the realtor, the contract may be voidable: see, for example, Bank of Montreal v. Southcombe, 2012 ABQB 20. Likewise, it is a basic principle of contract law that where a party enters into a contract having been misled by fraudulent misrepresentation, ......
-
Bank of Montreal v. Landry, [2012] A.R. Uned. 823 (QBM)
...Mr. Donszelmann has been the subject of judicial comment for his involvement in various RV rental schemes: Bank of Montréal v. Southcombe 2012 ABQB 20. The Bank Montréal chose not to cross-examine the Landrys on their affidavits with the result that there is no clear evidence of the connect......