Bank of Montreal v. Woodbine Park, 2016 NSSM 39
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Subject Matter | LANDLORD AND TENANT,PRACTICE,STATUTES |
| Citation | 2016 NSSM 39,[2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 169,[2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 169 (SmCl) |
| Court | Small Claims Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Date | 06 June 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Pierce v. Westphal Court Limited, 2020 NSSM 13
...forms of legal persons - but as I observed in a different context involving this same Landlord, in Bank of Montreal v. Woodbine Park, 2016 NSSM 39 [27] As such, for most purposes, it is clear that the Residential Tenancies Act has no application to ......
2 cases
-
D. Jockel Holdings Ltd. v. Vardigans,
...with the latter referring specifically to a natural person as opposed to a corporation: Bank of Montreal v. Woodbine Park, 2016 NSSM 39. When the word “individual” is used in the Residential Tenancies Act, that word is usually used in reference to someone who is a tenant......
-
Pierce v. Westphal Court Limited, 2020 NSSM 13
...forms of legal persons - but as I observed in a different context involving this same Landlord, in Bank of Montreal v. Woodbine Park, 2016 NSSM 39 [27] As such, for most purposes, it is clear that the Residential Tenancies Act has no application to ......