Blake v. Blake, (1998) 203 N.B.R.(2d) 134 (CA)
Judge | Ryan, Turnbull and Larlee, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
Case Date | June 23, 1998 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (1998), 203 N.B.R.(2d) 134 (CA) |
Blake v. Blake (1998), 203 N.B.R.(2d) 134 (CA);
203 R.N.-B.(2e) 134; 518 A.P.R. 134
MLB headnote and full text
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Temp. Cite: [1998] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. AU.025
Maria Louise (Lucy) Blake (applicant/appellant) v. James M. Blake (respondent/respondent)
(245/97/CA)
Indexed As: Blake v. Blake
New Brunswick Court of Appeal
Ryan, Turnbull and Larlee, JJ.A.
July 30, 1998.
Summary:
A couple separated after 29 years of marriage. The wife sought a division of property, including an interest in the husband's business. She also sought spousal support.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, in a decision reported at 193 N.B.R.(2d) 285; 493 A.P.R. 285, determined the division of property and awarded the wife spousal support. The wife appealed the failure to make an indefinite spousal support order, the amount of the support order, the division of a particular property and the interpretation of s. 2 of the Marital Property Act when dividing the marital and non-marital property.
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
Family Law - Topic 877
Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Business, commercial or non-family assets - A couple separated after 29 years of marriage - There were no children - The husband owned a construction company valued at $275,000 - The wife worked part-time and was responsible for the majority of the household duties - She made very minor contributions to the business - For three years prior to the separation the company gave the wife $15,000 as part of an income split for income tax purposes - The wife received an equal division ($244,909) of the marital property - The wife sought a 25 to 35 percent interest in the business - The trial judge awarded the wife a 10% interest in the company - The wife appealed - The New Brunswick Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal - See paragraph 9.
Family Law - Topic 880.36
Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Particular property - Active business - [See Family Law - Topic 877 ].
Family Law - Topic 2213
Maintenance of wives and children - General principles - Extent of duty to support -[See Family Law - Topic 2484 ].
Family Law - Topic 2484
Maintenance of wives and children - Awards - Periodic payments - A couple separated in 1995 after 29 years of marriage - The wife, age 52, worked part-time earning $15,959 - She suffered from various health problems - She made no attempts to find full time employment or to upgrade her skills - She received over $270,000 in the division of property - The husband, age 57, owned a construction contracting company - He also suffered from health problems and could no longer do strenuous work in relation to the company - He had been paying $1,250 interim spousal support - The trial judge ordered the husband to pay $1,250 spousal support until September 2000, at which time the matter could be reviewed - The wife appealed the amount of the support order and the failure to make an indefinite order - The New Brunswick Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal - See paragraphs 1 to 8.
Cases Noticed:
Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 8].
Counsel:
Heather Satin-Skinner, for the appellant;
Sherron J.L. Dickson, Q.C., for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on June 23, 1998, by Ryan, Turnbull and Larlee, JJ.A., of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal delivered the following decision on July 30, 1998.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
B.P. v. A.T.,
...B.C.A.C. 161; 255 W.A.C. 161; 2001 SCC 60, refd to. [para. 19]. Van de Perre v. Edwards - see/voir K.V.P. v. T.E. Blake v. Blake (1998), 203 N.B.R.(2d) 134; 518 A.P.R. 22 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22]. Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [......
-
B.P. v. A.T.,
...B.C.A.C. 161; 255 W.A.C. 161; 2001 SCC 60, refd to. [para. 19]. Van de Perre v. Edwards - see/voir K.V.P. v. T.E. Blake v. Blake (1998), 203 N.B.R.(2d) 134; 518 A.P.R. 22 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 22]. Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813; 145 N.R. 1; 81 Man.R.(2d) 161; 30 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [......