Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196

JudgeFeth
Citation2020 ABQB 196
Date20 March 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket NumberFL10 07655
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Evidence; Procedure; Costs
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...Rule 77.02 (1) of the Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules. 286 [2003] 3 SCR 371. See also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at para 44 (interim interdependent partner support under the Family Law Act, Alberta); Martin v Watts, 2018 ONSC Child Support Guidelines in Canad......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...v Bland, [1999] AJ No 344, 48 RFL (4th) 250, 1999 ABQB 236................................. 150, 275, 282, 319, 527 Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196............................................................................................................................ 633 Blaschuk v Bridg......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...J, of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench (Family Division), in Gray v Gray: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ONSC 5321. See also Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at para 44 (interim interdependent partner support under the Family Law Act, Alberta). Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at para 29, Cal......
  • VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Noviembre 2020
    ...ABCA 241, which focuses on the financial need of the applicant, prevails: see, for example VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 and Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196. [15] With respect, this creates a false dichotomy in the law when none exists. In Okanagan Indian Band, the majority and dissent both discu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
  • VMH v JH, 2020 ABCA 389
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Noviembre 2020
    ...ABCA 241, which focuses on the financial need of the applicant, prevails: see, for example VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849 and Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196. [15] With respect, this creates a false dichotomy in the law when none exists. In Okanagan Indian Band, the majority and dissent both discu......
  • Aiello v Aiello, 2020 ABQB 549
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Septiembre 2020
    ...law cases as it provides a principled basis upon which the Court can consider granting an extraordinary remedy: see Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at paragraphs 118 to [55] Vince’s counsel focussed on the fact that Linda is not impecunious, one of the elements of the tripartite test; he als......
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...v Bland, [1999] AJ No 344, 48 RFL (4th) 250, 1999 ABQB 236................................. 150, 275, 282, 319, 527 Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196............................................................................................................................ 633 Blaschuk v Bridg......
  • Evidence; Procedure; Costs
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022
    • 27 Julio 2022
    ...Rule 77.02 (1) of the Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rules. 286 [2003] 3 SCR 371. See also VLN v SRN, 2019 ABQB 849; Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at para 44 (interim interdependent partner support under the Family Law Act, Alberta); Martin v Watts, 2018 ONSC Child Support Guidelines in Canad......
  • Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...J, of the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench (Family Division), in Gray v Gray: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ONSC 5321. See also Blaney v Murphy, 2020 ABQB 196 at para 44 (interim interdependent partner support under the Family Law Act, Alberta). Wongstedt v Wongstedt, 2017 SKCA 100 at para 29, Cal......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT