Blazek v. Blazek,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Neilson J.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Citation | [2010] B.C.A.C. Uned. 46 (CA),2010 BCCA 188,[2010] B.C.A.C. Uned. 46 |
| Date | 23 March 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Nordmark v. Frykman,
...Andrew Peller Ltd. at para. 11; McIntyre at para. 57; Blazek v. Blazek, 2009 BCSC 1693 at para. 61, 66 C.P.C. (6th) 128, leave granted, 2010 BCCA 188, but appeal abandoned. However, in Liu v. Huang, 2008 BCSC 288, 59 C.P.C. (6th) 1, a forum non conveniens argument succeeded even though the ......
-
Forum Non Conveniens
...a de fendant who attorns cannot seek a stay of proceedings: O’Brien v Simard, 2006 BCSC 814. This may be changing: see Blazek v Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188. Egbert v Short, [1907] 2 Ch 205; St Pierre v South American Stores Ltd, [1936] 1 KB 382 at 398 [1978] AC 795 at 812 (HL), Lord Diplock [MacS......
-
Cougar Helicopters Inc. et al. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. et al.,
...of Canada et al. (2008), 444 A.R. 102; 95 Alta. L.R.(4th) 74 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 102]. Blazek v. Blazek, [2010] B.C.A.C. Uned. 46; 2010 BCCA 188, refd to. [para. 103]. Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; 150 N.R. 321; 23 B.C.A.C. 1; 39......
-
Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc.,
...has more recently repeated its view that the present law bars a forum non conveniens challenge after attornment. In Blazek v. Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188, which was also an application for leave to appeal, Neilson J.A., in Chambers, granted leave on the basis that the existing law could well be r......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Nordmark v. Frykman, 2019 BCCA 433
...Andrew Peller Ltd. at para. 11; McIntyre at para. 57; Blazek v. Blazek, 2009 BCSC 1693 at para. 61, 66 C.P.C. (6th) 128, leave granted, 2010 BCCA 188, but appeal abandoned. However, in Liu v. Huang, 2008 BCSC 288, 59 C.P.C. (6th) 1, a forum non conveniens argument succeeded even though the ......
-
Cougar Helicopters Inc. et al. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. et al., (2010) 304 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 60 (NLTD(G))
...of Canada et al. (2008), 444 A.R. 102; 95 Alta. L.R.(4th) 74 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 102]. Blazek v. Blazek, [2010] B.C.A.C. Uned. 46; 2010 BCCA 188, refd to. [para. 103]. Amchem Products Inc. et al. v. Workers' Compensation Board (B.C.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 897; 150 N.R. 321; 23 B.C.A.C. 1; 39......
-
Schwarzinger et al. v. Bramwell et al., 2011 BCSC 283
...to the jurisdiction of this court, it is not necessary to address this issue. [58] I note for completeness that in Blazek v. Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188 (Chambers), Neilson J.A. granted leave to appeal, among other things, the issue of whether attornment is a bar to arguing forum non conveniens. ......
-
Andrew Peller Ltd. v. Mori Essex Nurseries Inc., 2017 BCSC 203
...has more recently repeated its view that the present law bars a forum non conveniens challenge after attornment. In Blazek v. Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188, which was also an application for leave to appeal, Neilson J.A., in Chambers, granted leave on the basis that the existing law could well be r......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Forum Non Conveniens
...a de fendant who attorns cannot seek a stay of proceedings: O’Brien v Simard, 2006 BCSC 814. This may be changing: see Blazek v Blazek, 2010 BCCA 188. Egbert v Short, [1907] 2 Ch 205; St Pierre v South American Stores Ltd, [1936] 1 KB 382 at 398 [1978] AC 795 at 812 (HL), Lord Diplock [MacS......