Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice C.M. Jones
Citation2018 ABQB 560
Date25 July 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1201 15689
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 3, 2022
    ...ABQB 911; Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020  ABQB 546; Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106; Blough v Busy Music Inc., 2018 ABQB 560; Gas Plus Inc. v Levelton Consultants Ltd., 2017 ABQB 655; Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214; PM & C Specialist Con......
  • Mbh v Cki,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2023
    ...and are compelled to answer questions that are relevant and material to the underlying application: rule 6.7; Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at para 37; Rozak Estate v Demas, 2011 ABQB 239 at para 30. In some cases, as noted earlier, the affiant may be compelled to provide undertaki......
  • Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2020 ABQB 19
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 10, 2020
    ...Overview [1] This is a costs decision arising out of my decision dated July 25, 2018, reported at 2018 ABQB 560 (“July 2018 Decision”) and the follow-up decision dated July 26, 2019, reported at 2019 ABQB 569 (“July 2019 Decision”). Those decisions relate to document production and undert......
  • Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...judge, a motion judge is prevented from ruling on the credibility of a deponent. [emphasis added] [15] See also Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at paras [16] Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1. The scope of cross-examination on aff......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 3, 2022
    ...ABQB 911; Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020  ABQB 546; Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106; Blough v Busy Music Inc., 2018 ABQB 560; Gas Plus Inc. v Levelton Consultants Ltd., 2017 ABQB 655; Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214; PM & C Specialist Con......
  • Mbh v Cki,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2023
    ...and are compelled to answer questions that are relevant and material to the underlying application: rule 6.7; Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at para 37; Rozak Estate v Demas, 2011 ABQB 239 at para 30. In some cases, as noted earlier, the affiant may be compelled to provide undertaki......
  • Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2020 ABQB 19
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 10, 2020
    ...Overview [1] This is a costs decision arising out of my decision dated July 25, 2018, reported at 2018 ABQB 560 (“July 2018 Decision”) and the follow-up decision dated July 26, 2019, reported at 2019 ABQB 569 (“July 2019 Decision”). Those decisions relate to document production and undert......
  • Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...judge, a motion judge is prevented from ruling on the credibility of a deponent. [emphasis added] [15] See also Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at paras [16] Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1. The scope of cross-examination on aff......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT