Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice C.M. Jones |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 560 |
| Date | 25 July 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 1201 15689 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188
...ABQB 911; Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546; Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106; Blough v Busy Music Inc., 2018 ABQB 560; Gas Plus Inc. v Levelton Consultants Ltd., 2017 ABQB 655; Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214; PM & C Specialist Con......
-
Mbh v Cki,
...and are compelled to answer questions that are relevant and material to the underlying application: rule 6.7; Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at para 37; Rozak Estate v Demas, 2011 ABQB 239 at para 30. In some cases, as noted earlier, the affiant may be compelled to provide undertaki......
-
Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2020 ABQB 19
...Overview [1] This is a costs decision arising out of my decision dated July 25, 2018, reported at 2018 ABQB 560 (“July 2018 Decision”) and the follow-up decision dated July 26, 2019, reported at 2019 ABQB 569 (“July 2019 Decision”). Those decisions relate to document production and undert......
-
Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546
...judge, a motion judge is prevented from ruling on the credibility of a deponent. [emphasis added] [15] See also Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at paras [16] Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1. The scope of cross-examination on aff......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188
...ABQB 911; Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546; Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106; Blough v Busy Music Inc., 2018 ABQB 560; Gas Plus Inc. v Levelton Consultants Ltd., 2017 ABQB 655; Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214; PM & C Specialist Con......
-
Mbh v Cki,
...and are compelled to answer questions that are relevant and material to the underlying application: rule 6.7; Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at para 37; Rozak Estate v Demas, 2011 ABQB 239 at para 30. In some cases, as noted earlier, the affiant may be compelled to provide undertaki......
-
Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2020 ABQB 19
...Overview [1] This is a costs decision arising out of my decision dated July 25, 2018, reported at 2018 ABQB 560 (“July 2018 Decision”) and the follow-up decision dated July 26, 2019, reported at 2019 ABQB 569 (“July 2019 Decision”). Those decisions relate to document production and undert......
-
Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546
...judge, a motion judge is prevented from ruling on the credibility of a deponent. [emphasis added] [15] See also Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at paras [16] Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1. The scope of cross-examination on aff......
Get Started for Free