Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice C.M. Jones
Citation2018 ABQB 560
Date25 July 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1201 15689
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP, 2022 ABQB 188
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 3, 2022
    ...ABQB 911; Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020  ABQB 546; Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106; Blough v Busy Music Inc., 2018 ABQB 560; Gas Plus Inc. v Levelton Consultants Ltd., 2017 ABQB 655; Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214; PM & C Specialist Con......
  • Mbh v Cki,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2023
    ...and are compelled to answer questions that are relevant and material to the underlying application: rule 6.7; Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at para 37; Rozak Estate v Demas, 2011 ABQB 239 at para 30. In some cases, as noted earlier, the affiant may be compelled to provide undertaki......
  • Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...judge, a motion judge is prevented from ruling on the credibility of a deponent. [emphasis added] [15] See also Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at paras [16] Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1. The scope of cross-examination on aff......
  • Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2019 ABQB 569
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 26, 2019
    ...on the outstanding Application. A Memorandum of Decision was issued on July 25, 2018 regarding certain production and questioning issues: 2018 ABQB 560. The factual background is set out in detail in that decision. [4] This decision is a follow up to that decision, and is in respect of the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 3, 2022
    ...ABQB 911; Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020  ABQB 546; Real Estate Council of Alberta v Moser, 2019 ABQB 106; Blough v Busy Music Inc., 2018 ABQB 560; Gas Plus Inc. v Levelton Consultants Ltd., 2017 ABQB 655; Bechir v Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, 2017 ABQB 214; PM & C Specialist Con......
  • Mbh v Cki,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 15, 2023
    ...and are compelled to answer questions that are relevant and material to the underlying application: rule 6.7; Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at para 37; Rozak Estate v Demas, 2011 ABQB 239 at para 30. In some cases, as noted earlier, the affiant may be compelled to provide undertaki......
  • Edmonton (City) v Gosine, 2020 ABQB 546
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 17, 2020
    ...judge, a motion judge is prevented from ruling on the credibility of a deponent. [emphasis added] [15] See also Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2018 ABQB 560 at paras [16] Drawing these authorities together, I summarize the applicable principles as follows: 1. The scope of cross-examination on aff......
  • Blough v Busy Music Inc, 2019 ABQB 569
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 26, 2019
    ...on the outstanding Application. A Memorandum of Decision was issued on July 25, 2018 regarding certain production and questioning issues: 2018 ABQB 560. The factual background is set out in detail in that decision. [4] This decision is a follow up to that decision, and is in respect of the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT