Boll v Woodlands County,
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice S.N. Mandziuk |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 406 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 406 |
| Docket Number | 1603 22391 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 21 May 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
WW v Alberta (Human Rights Tribunal),
...2017 ABQB 204 at paras 11-17; ENMAX Corporation v Alberta (Labour Relations Board), 2018 ABQB 431 at para 13; Boll v Woodlands County, 2021 ABQB 406 at para 68; Neilson v Leduc (County), 2021 ABQB 735 at paras 26-27. [8] The words “directly affected” in Rule 3.15(3)(c) must be......
-
Julien v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers' Compensation),
...2017 ABQB 204 at paras 11-17; ENMAX Corporation v Alberta (Labour Relations Board), 2018 ABQB 431 at para 13; Boll v Woodlands County, 2021 ABQB 406 at para 68; Neilson v Leduc (County), 2021 ABQB 735 at paras 7 The central question on this appeal, therefore, is whether Mr. Julien's em......
2 cases
-
WW v Alberta (Human Rights Tribunal),
...2017 ABQB 204 at paras 11-17; ENMAX Corporation v Alberta (Labour Relations Board), 2018 ABQB 431 at para 13; Boll v Woodlands County, 2021 ABQB 406 at para 68; Neilson v Leduc (County), 2021 ABQB 735 at paras 26-27. [8] The words “directly affected” in Rule 3.15(3)(c) must be......
-
Julien v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers' Compensation),
...2017 ABQB 204 at paras 11-17; ENMAX Corporation v Alberta (Labour Relations Board), 2018 ABQB 431 at para 13; Boll v Woodlands County, 2021 ABQB 406 at para 68; Neilson v Leduc (County), 2021 ABQB 735 at paras 7 The central question on this appeal, therefore, is whether Mr. Julien's em......