Bracken v. Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Doherty, LaForme and Miller JJ.A. |
Citation | 2018 ONCA 261 |
Docket Number | C62796 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Date | 19 March 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Digest: Dubois v Government of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 241
...(City), 2011 ONSC 6862, 342 DLR (4th) 129 Bracken v Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, 137 OR (3d) 161 Bracken v Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, 421 DLR (4th) 157 City of Burnaby v Patricia Kelly, Aug10/18 BCSC, No S 188298, Gomery J Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v Canada, [19......
-
T.L. v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...“The first step in assessing the constitutionality of [legislation] is interpretation”: Bracken v. Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261 at para. 18. See also B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Association v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 6 at [101] ......
-
R. v. Sharma, 2020 ONCA 478
...violations of rights: Bracken v. Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, 137 O.R. (3d) 161, at para. 61; Bracken v. Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, 141 O.R. (3d) 168, at para. 33. Were it otherwise, courts would be in the scandalous position of being invited to sanction rights violations. Can......
-
Lethbridge and District Pro-Life Association v Lethbridge (City), 2020 ABQB 654
...relies on two decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Bracken v Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, and Bracken v Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, as support for the proposition that public upset is not a sufficient basis to displace the right to freedom of expression. It is not justifia......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
T.L. v. British Columbia (Attorney General),
...“The first step in assessing the constitutionality of [legislation] is interpretation”: Bracken v. Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261 at para. 18. See also B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Association v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2017 SCC 6 at [101] ......
-
R. v. Sharma, 2020 ONCA 478
...violations of rights: Bracken v. Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, 137 O.R. (3d) 161, at para. 61; Bracken v. Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, 141 O.R. (3d) 168, at para. 33. Were it otherwise, courts would be in the scandalous position of being invited to sanction rights violations. Can......
-
Lethbridge and District Pro-Life Association v Lethbridge (City), 2020 ABQB 654
...relies on two decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Bracken v Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, and Bracken v Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, as support for the proposition that public upset is not a sufficient basis to displace the right to freedom of expression. It is not justifia......
-
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF SASKATCHEWAN v. DUROCHER, 2020 SKQB 224
...ONSC 6862, 108 OR (3d) 571 [Batty]; Bracken v Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, 137 OR (3d) 161 [Bracken]; Bracken v Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, 141 OR (3d) 168; Calgary (City) v Bullock (Occupy Calgary), 2011 ABQB 764, [2012] 7 WWR 283 [Bullock]; Dubois; Vancouver (City) v Zhang, 2......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 19 March 23)
...it falls within the trial judge's broad discretion over costs, and reflects no error in principle. Bracken v. Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261 [Doherty, LaForme and Miller JJ.A.] Counsel: F Bracken, acting in person J Craig and T Khoury, for the respondent Keywords: Constitutional Law, C......
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Dubois v Government of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 241
...(City), 2011 ONSC 6862, 342 DLR (4th) 129 Bracken v Fort Erie (Town), 2017 ONCA 668, 137 OR (3d) 161 Bracken v Niagara Parks Police, 2018 ONCA 261, 421 DLR (4th) 157 City of Burnaby v Patricia Kelly, Aug10/18 BCSC, No S 188298, Gomery J Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v Canada, [19......