Brayford Estate, Re, 2015 SKQB 336
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Zuk, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | TRUSTS,REAL PROPERTY,EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS |
| Citation | 2015 SKQB 336,2014 Q.B.S. No. 719 |
| Date | 26 October 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Dahl (Re), 2018 BCSC 889
...upon the legal summary found at paras. 13–22, and particularly paras. 18–21, in Brayford v. Brayford Estate, 2015 SKQB 336. However, as seen at paras. 13 and 20 in Brayford, a right of retainer can exist only where the intended beneficiary, Ms. Dahl i......
-
Kolic Estate (Re),
...in Tillie v. Springer, [1892] O.J. No. 207 does not apply to a specific bequest, the right of set-off does. In June Brayford v. Brayford, 2015 SKQB 336, Zuk J. considered the principle in Cherry where “the executors [were] not entitled to claim a right of retainer (a form of set-off)......
2 cases
-
Dahl (Re), 2018 BCSC 889
...upon the legal summary found at paras. 13–22, and particularly paras. 18–21, in Brayford v. Brayford Estate, 2015 SKQB 336. However, as seen at paras. 13 and 20 in Brayford, a right of retainer can exist only where the intended beneficiary, Ms. Dahl i......
-
Kolic Estate (Re),
...in Tillie v. Springer, [1892] O.J. No. 207 does not apply to a specific bequest, the right of set-off does. In June Brayford v. Brayford, 2015 SKQB 336, Zuk J. considered the principle in Cherry where “the executors [were] not entitled to claim a right of retainer (a form of set-off)......