BRITTO v.UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN, 2018 SKQB 92
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | DANYLIUK J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 92 |
| Docket Number | QBG 979 of 2016 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 22 March 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...(Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2006 BCSC 131 ......................................213, 214 Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92 ......................................... 244 Bronskill v Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2011 FC 983 ..................................... 180 ......
-
Personal Information in the Public Sector
...2002 SKCA 142, upholding this interpretation by the Information And Privacy Commissioner. See also Britto v University of Saskatchewan , 2018 SKQB 92 at paras 92–94. 59 See, for example, AB FOIPPA , above note 16, s 18(b); MB FOIPPA , above note 16, s 24(b); NB RTIPPA , above note 38, s 28(......
-
WEST v. GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN (MINISTRY OF HEALTH), 2020 SKQB 244
...submissions and the applicable law, then determines what order, if any, should be made, as set out in ss. 58(5) – (8): Britto #2, [2018 SKQB 92]at para . . . Leo #2 [9] In the Step One Decision, I determined that it was necessary for me to review the records in question in camera before pr......
-
EATON v. THE UNIVERSITY OF REGINA, 2021 SKQB 40
...bears the onus of establishing that these records need not be disclosed: ss. 5.1 and 51 of LAFOIP: Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92 at para 24 [Britto 2]; University of Saskatchewan v Saskatchewan (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2018 SKCA 34 at para [15] Finally, a ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
WEST v. GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN (MINISTRY OF HEALTH), 2020 SKQB 244
...submissions and the applicable law, then determines what order, if any, should be made, as set out in ss. 58(5) – (8): Britto #2, [2018 SKQB 92]at para . . . Leo #2 [9] In the Step One Decision, I determined that it was necessary for me to review the records in question in camera before pr......
-
EATON v. THE UNIVERSITY OF REGINA, 2021 SKQB 40
...bears the onus of establishing that these records need not be disclosed: ss. 5.1 and 51 of LAFOIP: Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92 at para 24 [Britto 2]; University of Saskatchewan v Saskatchewan (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2018 SKCA 34 at para [15] Finally, a ......
-
Leo v. Global Transportation Hub Authority, 2018 SKQB 323
...para 13; Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2017 SKQB 259 at para 19, 13 CPC (8th) 187 [Britto #1]; Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92 [Britto [36] The onus of proving that access to the records sought should not be granted, in this case, is on GTH: FOIP, s 61. [37] An appe......
-
ESOPENKO v. VILLAGE OF MEATH PARK,
...When this application came before me I adopted the approach that Justice Danyliuk described in Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92 at para 3. (a) the Village and the Rural Municipality have filed with the court, under seal, copies of th......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...(Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2006 BCSC 131 ......................................213, 214 Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92 ......................................... 244 Bronskill v Canada (Canadian Heritage), 2011 FC 983 ..................................... 180 ......
-
Personal Information in the Public Sector
...2002 SKCA 142, upholding this interpretation by the Information And Privacy Commissioner. See also Britto v University of Saskatchewan , 2018 SKQB 92 at paras 92–94. 59 See, for example, AB FOIPPA , above note 16, s 18(b); MB FOIPPA , above note 16, s 24(b); NB RTIPPA , above note 38, s 28(......
-
Digest: Britto v University of Saskatchewan, 2018 SKQB 92
...as: 2018 SKQB 92 Docket Number: QB17476 , QBG 979/16 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-03-22 Judges: Danyliuk Subjects: Statutes � Interpretation � The Local Authority Freedom of Information and Privacy Act Digest: The appellant appealed to the Court of Queen�s Bench under s. 46(......